Then, why was there a bump in the ground and the FBI said that it bumped off the ground and hit the Pentagon when there was only one small dent which could not have possibly been created by the plane?
Printable View
Then, why was there a bump in the ground and the FBI said that it bumped off the ground and hit the Pentagon when there was only one small dent which could not have possibly been created by the plane?
explain to me, why couldnt the plane make more then one hole? if you have an explosion, debris is going to fly all over the place, thus creating more damage.
Isaac Newton's Law of Gravity proves that it is wrong.
The time it took when the north tower collapsed was 10.23 seconds, Isaac Newton's law states it should have been 9.2
Im shutting up now because I cba and Im watching this http://www.southparkzone.com/episode-vid-1009.htm
each impact on another floor is going to slow down its pull towards earth, its going to obsorb its shock.
those videos make me laugh, they talk more crap then you do.
I'm sure it would b around 9.2 which 10.23 is as it would beimpossible to know if an area held out more or if the collapse started when it was meant to of.
thanks matey
god. :( I'd say terrorists but I don't know exactly lol
Blue = Loose change
Green = http://www.loosechangeguide.com/lcg2...ebris%20photos
Quote:
Third. You only have to look at the photos from that day to realize that whatever hit the Pentagon did not bounce off the lawn.
Who said anything "bounced off" the lawn?
If Flight 77 had crash landed and skidded into the Pentagon, it would have looked like this.
"Crash landed and skidded?" What in the world are you talking about?
Instead, it looked like this, without a single scratch on the lawn.
http://www.loosechangeguide.com/images/image039.jpg
This stuff would be hilarious if the subject wasn't so serious.
If flight 77 had crashed like this, it would have slid across several lanes of highway that was filled with bumper-to-bumper traffic.
Funny, none of the dozens of witnesses reported that happening.