Did America land on the moon in 1969? - [Closes 23/12/07]

Right, time to prove these 'OMG IT'S FAKE' theories wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ealo

There is lots of evidence that it was faked.
The flag for instance,
why is it moving if there is no gravity/air?

Fake ftw.

---

That's already be commented on, the flag has a horizontal bar through the top to keep it upright and was made with a ripple effect so it didn't look flat/plain.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redtom

Okay so lets think;

Lines of shadows collide (this is impossible with one light source (the sun in this case))

Not seen photos.

When you speed up a copy of the film the men are running like people would on the earth.

Or the film.

When you look at diffrent appol missions areas of the moon said to have never been seen before look the same as other places from earlyer appol missions.

The moon looks the same in most places.

The flag waves, it's been proven that this couldn't of happend on the moon as it did in the film.

Commented on this above.

Magicly the only people to have gone to the moon are nassa.

Because you have to be trained? And Russia and other nations haven't had a program running yet.

Sciences have found out there is a boundery of radiation around the earth what no man can pass though with out dieing, or atleast dieing after passing through it (well at the time with the stuff they had with them they couldn't pass through with out any effect)

I loled. No, there isn't. Try and tell me how people have go to the ISS then?


No landing crater, if the landing craft landed like it would of on the moon there would be a crater yet theres nothing.

The moon isn't made of cheese, it's HARD rock. Remember, gravity would of reduced the effect of the landing.


No dust on the landing craft, if the landing craft landed on the moon dust would of setteled on the craft.

How would it? Maybe on the bottom, but not all over the spacecraft?

Photos from the landings have been proven to have been edited.

Proof?
MAJOR POINT:

In the film when people walk behide the landing craft in to the shadows you can see them, and this is impossible as the suns light would be blocked by the landing craft, and as theres only one lights source the sun it should be 100% darkness there you shouldn't beable to see a thing, yet magicly you can see the people there.

And yes people have "disappeard" after releasing stuff or about to release stuff what could prove the landings fake.

If I'm correct, if you have an object on the moon and you walk behind it, you wouldn't be in total darkness due to other stars, light reflecting off moon/earth/other planets.

---

It's fake in my opinion, there's a picture that shows the two 'on the Moon'. One is standing a few feet away from the other, yet hes has a much larget shadow. This would only be the case if the light source was a few feet away from both of them.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Axel

It's fake in my opinion, there's a picture that shows the two 'on the Moon'. One is standing a few feet away from the other, yet hes has a much larget shadow. This would only be the case if the light source was a few feet away from both of them.

---

Where's this picture? The only way there could be two of them in the same picture was a camera fixed onto the lander.

Yeah it was real becuase americans are amazing like that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by redtom

Okay so lets think;

Lines of shadows collide (this is impossible with one light source (the sun in this case))
When you speed up a copy of the film the men are running like people would on the earth.
When you look at diffrent appol missions areas of the moon said to have never been seen before look the same as other places from earlyer appol missions.
The flag waves, it's been proven that this couldn't of happend on the moon as it did in the film.
Magicly the only people to have gone to the moon are nassa.
Sciences have found out there is a boundery of radiation around the earth what no man can pass though with out dieing, or atleast dieing after passing through it (well at the time with the stuff they had with them they couldn't pass through with out any effect)
No landing crater, if the landing craft landed like it would of on the moon there would be a crater yet theres nothing.
No dust on the landing craft, if the landing craft landed on the moon dust would of setteled on the craft.
Photos from the landings have been proven to have been edited.

MAJOR POINT:

In the film when people walk behide the landing craft in to the shadows you can see them, and this is impossible as the suns light would be blocked by the landing craft, and as theres only one lights source the sun it should be 100% darkness there you shouldn't beable to see a thing, yet magicly you can see the people there.

And yes people have "disappeard" after releasing stuff or about to release stuff what could prove the landings fake.

EDIT: Reason why it's fake: Space Race. If you don't know what that was it was a big thing between russia and america, and as you know russia and america weren't the best of friends at the time anyway, russia got the first man in space, next was the moon, russia was winning but had to call it off because it was too much of a health risk to the people maning the craft, although america didn't know this and want to win the race, so they stopped the whole lets do it for real and just faked it, with the money they were going to use on getting some one to the moon for real.

---

I've been converted! :P

Since reading your post I think it's yet another American Conspiracy +rep

I gotta believe its real :]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kardan

That's already be commented on, the flag has a horizontal bar through the top to keep it upright and was made with a ripple effect so it didn't look flat/plain.

---

Since when have people made a flag with a ripple effect? The flag quite obviously moves a hell of lot randonly if you've seen more then just one of the apollo mission films you would agree with me.

The protection of the rocket wasnt strong enough and it has been prooven. If that rocket went OUT of the earths atmosphere it would have caught fire due to the heat.

Thats been prooven. The rocket only had like one layer of protection. That isnt enough.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by brodeo

Don't throw accusations around without a source. This is a debate, not a 'who can make up the best story' competition. There may not have been wind, but things still do have to move. The astronauts didn't struggle to move around did they? I guess neither did the flag.

---

Without a source? I am not making up a story :| Its fact. Look at any documentary .. or even search on the net yourself and you will find proof in all of them at everyone who tried to proove it was fake was murdered.

The guy who complied the 500 page report had many attempts on his life. The day he went to present his report to the court, he was murdered and the report went missing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Ealo

There is lots of evidence that it was faked.
The flag for instance,
why is it moving if there is no gravity/air?

Fake ftw.

---

becuase they put it up that way. there is footage of the astronauts playing with the flag to make it stand in a waving position.

all the "evidence" that it's fake has been disproved.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RedStratocas

becuase they put it up that way. there is footage of the astronauts playing with the flag to make it stand in a waving position.

all the "evidence" that it's fake has been disproved.

---

By >>>> NASSA <<<< and the >>>> USgoverment <<<<, there the ones covering it up, there not going to turn around and go "oh yeah thats right you've proved us wrong", Jesus if a guy in a milk truck drove past in the background with a big sign on it saying "this is fake" they would just say it was a shooting star.