Now, that would be intresting depending on who banned him ;]Quote:
Originally Posted by jrh2002
Printable View
Now, that would be intresting depending on who banned him ;]Quote:
Originally Posted by jrh2002
Tbh it would probably make habbox alot better!
I think it was madQuote:
Originally Posted by jrh2002
is it this announcement people are on about? - http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=441417
If it is it cleary says:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sierk
Yes thats the one im on about :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Blue
Ty for that quote.
weird, i pick fights heaps :D
Dan always had good reason to debate his view. He never posted just to cause trouble.
I always backup my arguements whether it's against New Labour or Management. If I think Management are behaving in the wrong sort of way I will say and I will back it up with previous examples of their failure to listen to people. I only advertise in my signature - which is allowed. I also am not here to cause trouble because if I was I would be spamming the forum now with nude pictures and having a go at sierk. Some things management do are good, the recent updating of the site was long needed and I welcome it and hope it keeps going.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sierk
However we will be stricter with members that are ONLY causing trouble all the time, for example by repeatedly complaining about specific members, repeatedly making complaints without good argumentation, being rude all the time, repeatedly advertising other websites and repeatedly saying they are better than this forum,
It clearly says in there that people who ONLY cause trouble. Undertaker made a few posts that caused trouble, the rest were good posts.
Exactly so he should be unbanned. He always posted with good reason and never posted to cause trouble (purposly) SO UNBAN HIM