New Rule

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

19-04-2008, 05:36 PM
---MAD---

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pyroka

Then, why isn't that in the rules. God, these new rules sound really bland and unspecific...

I have edited it slighty by putting the word "constantly" in it. Is that clearer?
19-04-2008, 05:47 PM
Pyroka

Definetly. :P Cheers.
19-04-2008, 05:50 PM
The Professor

Personally I think its a sad case of affairs that it's had to become a rule. Its a shame people couldn't take the message when sierk posted that announcement about being overly negative, or the thread closures, or constant warnings.
19-04-2008, 05:56 PM
Catzsy

Quote:

Originally Posted by Professor-Alex

Personally I think its a sad case of affairs that it's had to become a rule. Its a shame people couldn't take the message when sierk posted that announcement about being overly negative, or the thread closures, or constant warnings.

Well if its a rule Alex, everybody knows where they stand and everyone knows the consequences of breaking rules. To be banned when there isn't a rule about it is pretty confusing as well, I think.
19-04-2008, 06:12 PM
---MAD---

Quote:

Originally Posted by Catzsy

Well if its a rule Alex, everybody knows where they stand and everyone knows the consequences of breaking rules. To be banned when there isn't a rule about it is pretty confusing as well, I think.

But I think the rule itself is also obvious. Imagine someone letting you in their house for a big party for example, you go in and start criticizing everything, how the party is set up, how the house looks, where everything is, how the party host is controlling everything. Obviously you will get the boot as everyone else won't be enjoying themselves as much and you will just be annoying the host and everyone who is trying hard to make the party fun and a success.
19-04-2008, 06:29 PM
DaveTaylor

I praise the new rules, well A17 16 doesn't affect me really.
19-04-2008, 06:40 PM
shizzle

Quote:

Originally Posted by iFuseDave

I praise the new rules, well A17 16 doesn't affect me really.

Nor does it affect me.
19-04-2008, 06:40 PM
AgnesIO

Was A17 inputted because of Undertakers goings on.
19-04-2008, 06:46 PM
The Professor

Quote:

Originally Posted by ---MAD---

But I think the rule itself is also obvious. Imagine someone letting you in their house for a big party for example, you go in and start criticizing everything, how the party is set up, how the house looks, where everything is, how the party host is controlling everything. Obviously you will get the boot as everyone else won't be enjoying themselves as much and you will just be annoying the host and everyone who is trying hard to make the party fun and a success.

That's what I was getting at Rosie :) It should really go without saying, but people take it too far. That's probably how most habbox rules came about, the bullying infraction and the foreign languages rule spring to mind.

Quote:

Originally Posted by iFuseDave

I praise the new rules, well A17 16 doesn't affect me really.

Agreed, I think it was definately needed.
19-04-2008, 06:48 PM
shizzle

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ-Dominator

Was A17 inputted because of Undertakers goings on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Professor-Alex

That's what I was getting at Rosie :) It should really go without saying, but people take it too far. That's probably how most habbox rules came about, the bullying infraction and the foreign languages rule spring to mind.

Agreed, I think it was definately needed.

I agree with both of you.

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page