evaske - Unique Hosting Layout

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tenatious

Who in their right mind doesn't scroll the entire website before buying from them?

---

You're a designer right, so surely you know about the 'fold'? All your main content should be above the fold and secondary content, or not as important content (on a hosting site, stuff like news etc) should be below the fold, unless there is space left over from the main content above the fold. The fold by the way is the line where the browser window reaches, so go on the top sites and look at where the content is positioned. It's above the fold, and normally within the golden ratio (which means that say the main content box should be ~1.6 the size of the secondary sidebar).

A hosting site is not just a random site you come across, it is a site you visit for the purpose of looking at hosting or purchasing hosting, therefore a user knows what they are looking for and so is going to browse the site looking for hosting information...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wouter

You'd be surprised, a lot of people do that. Especially with hosting sites.

Log on, check package prices, go compare.

As I've said, hosting sites need to be small and easy accessible.
Like this:

iFuseHosting.com
1&1.co.uk


I love the design as I've said many-a-time, so don't get the impression I'm ******** it off. It just doesn't serve purpose for a hosting company.

---

Read this. Tenatious, you're not understanding the point. Hosting sites, need to be straight-viewable. Not having to scroll around. If you understand anything about the hosting industry, you'd understand why this isn't a suitable layout.

<img src="images/headers/packages.png" alt="Move your mouse over one of our below packages to view more info..."

You might want to close your img tags

It's not my coding :)
And as said in the first post. THe coding isn't correct for IE7 yet so needs to be changed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tenatious

It's not my coding :)
And as said in the first post. THe coding isn't correct for IE7 yet so needs to be changed.

---

I wasn't talking to you :)

lol :)