2010]

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

12-07-2010, 04:24 PM
Stryderman

do you have 6 fingers and webbed feet?

any type of incest is wrong, any blood relations to any1 is absolutely minging and even if they were married into your family and they are still "classed" as relatives like your auntie who aint blood to you but married ur uncle. thats just wrong aswell.

This thread is ridiculous why the hell would you legalise sleeping with your family? thats pretty much saying you cant get any sex outside your family its just pure skank

Quote:

Originally Posted by Special

close relatives absolute no, auntie/uncle 90/10 wrong, cousins.. 60/40 wrong large distance relatives, 80/20 yes
12-07-2010, 04:28 PM
Special

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryderman

do you have 6 fingers and webbed feet?

any type of incest is wrong, any blood relations to any1 is absolutely minging and even if they were married into your family and they are still "classed" as relatives like your auntie who aint blood to you but married ur uncle. thats just wrong aswell.

This thread is ridiculous why the hell would you legalise sleeping with your family? thats pretty much saying you cant get any sex outside your family its just pure skank

why did you quote my post for no apparent reason?
12-07-2010, 04:29 PM
Stryderman

cos of wht u said....

ur saying its alright to get with distant relatives..

which is why i said

DO U HAVE 6 FINGERS AND WEBBED FEET?

and carried on...

PROBLEM?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Special

why did you quote my post for no apparent reason?
12-07-2010, 04:30 PM
Special

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryderman

cos of wht u said....

ur saying its alright to get with distant relatives..

which is why i said

DO U HAVE 6 FINGERS AND WEBBED FEET?

and carried on...

PROBLEM?

normally people put the quote before they explain/add to it but whatever

i've now edited it

also, i didn't say my mother & father were close relatives, so no, i don't have 6 fingers & webbed feet
12-07-2010, 04:32 PM
Muct

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryderman

cos of wht u said....

ur saying its alright to get with distant relatives..

which is why i said

DO U HAVE 6 FINGERS AND WEBBED FEET?

and carried on...

PROBLEM?

You know, if you go back millions of years it would be possible for EVERYONE to be related... :/
Or atleast most lolol.
12-07-2010, 04:36 PM
Stryderman

yeh..
but then u can argue tht wht u jus said is complete ** depending on whether your religious or not.

and thts millionsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssss of years ago

Quote:

Originally Posted by Muct

You know, if you go back millions of years it would be possible for EVERYONE to be related... :/
Or atleast most lolol.
12-07-2010, 04:37 PM
Special

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stryderman

yeh..
but then u can argue tht wht u jus said is complete ** depending on whether your religious or not.

and thts millionsssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssss of years ago

so what if it was millions of years ago lol i don't think much has changed in terms of human genes
12-07-2010, 04:39 PM
Stryderman

Quote:

Originally Posted by Special

so what if it was millions of years ago lol i don't think much has changed in terms of human genes

cos i doubt many people can trace their family back a couple of hundred years let alone millions of years ago..

AN ANYWAY this is family now not millions of years ago CHRISTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT
12-07-2010, 05:07 PM
flatface

Quote:

Originally Posted by buttons

hey our genes are very very similar to apes and mice but i'm not going to go **** one, if a guy was to do that would you still being saying "it is none of your business nor that of the state what people do in their bedrooms"?. why's it wrong?

it's the same debate, you can call my point invalid but ask yourself why bestiality is wrong. how many people would willingly say it's fine? the only answer you'll hear is "it's disgusting, it's wrong, it's rape". it's the same with the view of incest. you can argue that incest may be consented and should be right if they both agree to it but that's not always the case. most of those sibling and even parent/child couples you hear of have been separated at an early age and once they're back together they feel a stronger bond. in my view, they're just confused and it's not healthy at all.
sure, it was once seen as okay years ago yes but so was slavery. okay that was the best i could think of damn:@:(

and actually no-one has the same genes. guys and girls have at least 80 different ones and the ones they share are different alleles serving different purposes.
i thought we were meant to be unconsciously attracted to people with different genes to ensure a balance and therefore healthier offspring so it's not "low-risk" health risks at all lol, that incest german couple (the ones who met after years apart - refer to what i said about that), 2 out of 4 of their kids are disabled :)

i would love to find a guy who treats me like my eldest brother does - not incest - just the same as a lot of hetrosexual guys look for girls like their mothers but the thought of a sexual relationship with him repulses me.

i'm just really against it for some reason, maybe it's in my genes:P i respect that times are changing and there are good arguments for why it's not all that bad but i personally find it revolting. sorry...

Someones listened in Biology! I agree with buttons, I find it disgusting its just not right. Even cousin to cousin I find wrong, don't ask me why because I can't explain why... It also exposes dysfunctional genes which would cause an outburst of some genetic disorders.
12-07-2010, 06:45 PM
Recursion

I don't see what's wrong with it if it's distant relations, close ones like brothers and sisters can cause genetic problems though... a bit manky too

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page