It's up to management to decide this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Samanfa
Printable View
It's up to management to decide this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Samanfa
I'm not stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesy
I asked a question beforehand, no one answered.
As both Jamesy and Sarah have said there was a need for an extra Super Moderator as two of the Super Moderators are very, very new - one of which only passed his trial a few weeks before his promotion, and although is capable to do the job Forum Super Moderator is a very complex job and a lot is expected of a Super Moderator, this pretty much left a burden on Martin as the only fully-able Super Moderator, in turn this puts James and Sarah under more pressure and we were seeing them complete more and more moderation tasks - on top of their other daily duties, this is too much for them in my opinion, it would be hard for them to moderate the forum on top of ensuring all the moderation is of an excellent standard. Therefore hiring another Super Moderator at this point, made sense.
For some time now there have been ideas to reform the Forum Department - and this weekend you will see phase 1 of the reform plans for Habbox Forum, later in the week phase two will appear and phases three and four will appear in consequent weeks.
The idea regarding moderation is to have HabboxForum moderated to an excellent standard, and should a proposal involving an experienced Super Moderator who has been very good at the job in the not so distant past, we will jump at this in an attempt to provide you with the best moderation.
I know it's in need of help. But surely she could have returned as a normal moderator.
This is like the Shar thing all over again.
But I did go back on my word, I do say Nicola is the best for the job at the time being.
And if we are arguing about this, then we should also be arguing the fact that kelly-Mate returned as a Trade Expert and not normal staff.
Does it even concern us directly? I don't see the point of another ridiculously long thread when it will hardly affect us*. The only thing we'll notice is the reports possibly done more quickly but other than that, nothing.
*Us excludes rulebreakers.
Feel free to tell me though.
She didn't return as a normal Moderator as it wouldn't have helped anything really, normal Moderators really do just tidy up nowadays and the main work is left to the Super Moderators - as Jamesy said this is due to the difference in the forum climate at the moment and is going to be addressed in phase 1 of our reform plan which will be revealed on Sunday.Quote:
Originally Posted by Samanfa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hecktix
But the second part to that is true though isn't it. We're arguing over something like this, when something the same happened in Rv. Kelly left as te kelly returned as a te.
But anyway, what's done is done.
It doesn't really bother me, a mods a mod at the end of the day. I suppose the normal moderator job is there to gain trust before giving them more 'power'.
I'm pretty sure we don't get a say in staff affairs. Also, why do you keep bringing this point back? It's got nothing to do with the ratio of supermods to normal moderators. That topic is over too now we've been told there are some new changes coming to the structure of moderators several times. Let it go.Quote:
Originally Posted by Samanfa
If she's good enough for the job there's no reason she shouldn't be able to return to that job, what's the point in putting someone in a role they are over-qualified for? It wouldn't happen in real life if there were positions available, so it'll happen here.Quote:
Originally Posted by Samanfa