Signature rule issue?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David

not hard ;l get icap

http://icap.me/i/LE9VXboish.png

---

I think he means you can't measure text to see if it's over size 7 as according to this forum

---------- Post added 21-05-2013 at 11:57 PM ----------

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chris

If we want to be exact about signature sizes (Which we do because I like being difficult) then this rule has to stay.



It's not possible to use size 7 anymore so no one can be punished for using it.

---

okay but it's still possible to use as long as it's saved as a png and uploaded?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chris

If we want to be exact about signature sizes (Which we do because I like being difficult) then this rule has to stay.



It's not possible to use size 7 anymore so no one can be punished.

---

I seriously do not follow, I can make my signature massive with size 6 text as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by laura

I think he means you can't measure text to see if it's over size 7 as according to this forum

---------- Post added 21-05-2013 at 11:57 PM ----------



okay but it's still possible to use as long as it's saved as a png and uploaded?

---

Yes its still possible but its within the restrictions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chippiewill

I seriously do not follow, I can make my signature massive with size 6 text as well.

---

Fine if you care that much then go ahead and use size 7! I don't know the real reasons it was stopped, I can only imagine its because its big and ugly. Matts the only one who can change it anyway so its him you've got to convince, not me.

Swear you people like to moan for the sake of moaning!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chris

Swear you people like to moan for the sake of moaning!

---

I'm more concerned about being right than moaning.

How is this thread still going it's such a non-issue and was just a misreading

That said, decent chuckle when Will said he likes being right, so not a totally useless thread I guess

Really, an entire thread on font size? Wow.

Tbf the size 7 in images vs size 7 in normal text is a bit confusing but this isn''t a massive issue.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chris

Yes its still possible but its within the restrictions.

---

ok i hate to carry on a thread for the sake of nothing but it's within what restrictions?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by laura

ok i hate to carry on a thread for the sake of nothing but it's within what restrictions?

---

700 x 300.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Chris

700 x 300.

---

It's just quite confusing, you know, if someone saw a signature with big text in they'd think they could do the same but they can't. Because the first person has it in image and you can't replicate that in actual text no matter how many characters you might have.

Just confusing. That's all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by laura

It's just quite confusing, you know, if someone saw a signature with big text in they'd think they could do the same but they can't. Because the first person has it in image and you can't replicate that in actual text no matter how many characters you might have.

Just confusing. That's all.

---

9 years in and it's not been a problem yet. :P