Originally Posted by
GommeInc
Hmmm, seems like an argument between Xbox 360 and PS3, with the Wii sitting in the corner getting crowned for glory.
The PS3 is awful, they make it too ridiculously expensive, but for the right reason. The Blu-Ray tech inside is new and powerful. But is this necessary in a Games Console? Not really. It's to play games for enjoyment, not to make them look nice. The PS3 may need less upgrading, but they have had more time and that extra time hasn't exactly made it that much better? Looking at an Xbox 360 and listening to some peoples opinions, it would appear to me that the Xbox 360 has about as good graphics as the PS3 for alot less. Microsoft have done the good gamer thing, by releasing a console for its players to enjoy, rather than holding it back a few years making people get bored of the phase.
The only reason I would ever buy a PS3 is for the cheap Blu-Ray technology. Finding it in a DVD player costs a lot more, so why not get something that is a lot cheaper and has about the same good use?
The PS2 was the best console Sony brought out. Good game play and one of this worrying too much about graphics. Where did they go wrong I wonder,,,