Actually, (I'm assuming you're able to count) I put down all 9, you just did 7.
Not really?
Yes I'm basing it on Fifa 09 as that's what you asked me when you said "what about Liverpool" in reference to the full list of 5 star teams on Fifa 09...
Printable View
Actually, (I'm assuming you're able to count) I put down all 9, you just did 7.
Not really?
Yes I'm basing it on Fifa 09 as that's what you asked me when you said "what about Liverpool" in reference to the full list of 5 star teams on Fifa 09...
That's not what I was asking when I said what about Liverpool. Was a Rhetorical question (sp.) saying that Liverpool should have been there. You can't base any of the ratings on Fifa 09 really, as ratings change a lot between the games. Plus your previous post made it seem like you know that these are the ratings on Fifa 10, which is what this thread is about, not fifa 09...
Almunia (GK) - 82
Fabianski (GK) - 73
Sagna (RB) - 83
Eboue (RB) - 80
Gallas (CB) - 83
Vermaelen (CB) - 84
Djourou (CB) -77
Silvestre (CB) - 76
Clichy (LB) - 83
Traore (LB) - 77
Rosicky (RW) - 85
Walcott (RW) - 81
Fabregas (CM) - 88
Denilson (CM) - 79
Song (CM) - 80
Diaby (CM) - 81
Ramsey (CM) - 77
Nasri (LW) - 85
Wilshere (LW) - 79
Arshavin (CF) - 86
V. Persie (CF) - 84
Eduardo (CF) - 84
Bendtner (CF) - 79
nah cause I think Liverpool will be and probably, I think Man City.
I can't see Liverpool not being 5 Tbh.
Wilshere won't be that high. FIFA never rate young players all that well. Maybe he'll be about 73. They don't rate players on their potential, otherwise I would agree with you wholeheartedly.
And is it just me who can't think of any stand-out players aside from Gerrard, Torres and Mascherano for Liverpool? I mean, United seem to have strength in depth, Chelsea maybe even more so, Arsenal have quality youngsters and even 2 of their arguably best players back from injury. I cant understand how Liverpool would get 5 stars.