Ouch, on par with ultrabooks, so around £800+ for windows 8 version, £400 for RT
Printable View
Ouch, on par with ultrabooks, so around £800+ for windows 8 version, £400 for RT
No price actually given to the devices apart from:
Quote:
Surface for Windows RT available in 32GB and 64GB — priced to competitive rates with ARM tablets.
Quote:
Intel version will have higher storage capacities... also priced to compete. So, no idea.
The Pro will be priced in the same range as Ultrabooks, to add to your list :)Quote:
Originally Posted by xxMATTGxx
EDIT: And in 64GB to 128GB models.
Here's a question for you all actually as I've seen on twitter that MS shouldn't compete with their partners so I ask you this:
Do you think Microsoft should compete with it's partners in terms of doing hardware like this? Or should they just leave it all to the OEM's like they have done many times before?
OOOO I LOVE THE LOOK OF THIS
Why not? Apple do it, albeit with no OEM's...Quote:
Originally Posted by xxMATTGxx
There's serious money to be made and Microsoft want more than just the license for Windows 8
Here's the video for it...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=dpzu3HM2CIo
Isn't this a Samsung device they're advertising at the moment, or was the spec page on the Surface website talking about the first Surface released years ago? :PQuote:
Originally Posted by xxMATTGxx
Apple do it because they are the only people to create it, they don't have OEMs. But Microsoft has a ton of partners and relationships could be ruined in a sense. I'm not saying it's a bad idea, it's just Paul Thurrott seems to think MS shouldn't do this.Quote:
Originally Posted by mrwoooooooo
---------- Post added 19-06-2012 at 01:07 AM ----------
The old "Microsoft Surface" was Samsung, no mention of Samsung today and it seems to be all Microsoft.Quote:
Originally Posted by GommeInc
What's the worst that can happen? They all pull out and leave Microsoft to get ALL the money?Quote:
Originally Posted by xxMATTGxx