Look at how many votes @Cassiieee; got when she asked people to vote for her compared to when she didn't get asked for votes.
@Cassiieee;'s punishment changing from 75% to 50% made no difference.
@Liva; won every single vote she was in
@Phil; How did evictions work in the case of a tie? I'm presuming you counted back through past evictions (The only reason I see @buttons; being evicted over @Ms.Aquamarine;) - but what would have happened if that wasn't possible? (For example, if I got one more vote in the eviction where I was evicted).
01-04-2014, 08:36 PM
scottish
Right on the 6th screenshot you have both Ms.Aquamarine and buttons on 5 votes
how did you pick who got evicted and who stayed?
01-04-2014, 08:39 PM
Samantha
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottish
Right on the 6th screenshot you have both Ms.Aquamarine and buttons on 5 votes
how did you pick who got evicted and who stayed?
I believe that was the day the voting messed up so the others before counted.
01-04-2014, 08:42 PM
scottish
fixed
01-04-2014, 08:44 PM
Liva
@kardan; I what?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
01-04-2014, 08:48 PM
Phil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kardan
Yes, you did tell us that Laura's username was in the anagram - not denying that. What we didn't know was the other error that the other team knew about. Laura's 9 letter username actually went in the 10 letter word slot - which the other team knew about. We never knew about this, so we were like 'Well, Laura's 9 letter username has to go in the only 9 letter word slot at the end - which was actually assistant).
Just so you don't think I was being more help to the other team I want to address this again. The received the same information you got. I didn't tell them about where it was, there was an error with the amount of letters or anything like that. I just told them that 'lawrawrrr' was indeed in the anagram.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Inseriousity.
Well how much exactly did Elliott and Nick get involved? By sounds of things, Phil was practically juggling Ant, Dec and Keith singlehandedly 99% of the time (we know that they must've used it a little if someone accidently voted on Dec). Perhaps pride meant Phil didn't reach out for help or maybe he did, I won't be able to answer that, but either way if it was apparent to everyone outside of the event that someone needed to jump in and provide a bit of assistance - even if it was something simple like chatting with the contestants more - then it could've been recognised by yourself too.
I know that you have a lot of forums so these things can get missed though so I understand the mentions point but a closer eye on things in future should aid the planning process.
I was juggling quite a bit at the start tbh but then you probably noticed that Ant was doing a whole eviction or Dec was doing a whole eviction. This was because in the second week of the competition my computer was giving me hassle and would have been way too slow switching over and back.
The reason for not asking for a lot of help wasn't down to pride. When was the last time the Forum did anything by themselves besides the Easter egg hunts and its variations? I really thought the department should have been able to handle this. It was preparation of tasks that let us down. I didn't want to call out to other departments because I didn't want people to think "Oh this is a Competitions Event, Phil is just providing the Forum". I called out to AGM's and the mods and I thought that should have been enough.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle
oh and i'd love to know your reasoning behind putting each member in the jungle. can we collectively interview kiosk keith?
Taken directly from the thread.
I've done up to #40
Kardan - He's normally the host and I think it will be interesting seeing him in the other side of the fence and lets be honest, he'll probably be the brains of the group.
Cornbix - From all the 'trolls' of Habbox, I think he has the best app and I think he'll cause a bit of commotion and will be fun.
Inseriousity. - I think he'll be good, he was quite good in The Mole and you all seem to like Ms. Aquamarine (and I do too!) and I think it would be entertaining to have a couple in there. Especially if we can pin them against one another.
Ms. Aquamarine - For the above reasons & she's literally the nicest person in the world I can totally see her being the mammy of the group.
Liva - Like others have said, she's new and I think it'd be good to have at least one person who isn't well known just to see how they get on and if we can get them out of their shell a bit.
Cassiieee - Do I even need to say? What a drama queen! It'd literally be so much fun to see the havoc and see how much annoyance she can cause.
bolt660 - I think he'll be really funny in it and I think he'll get really mad at someone during the competition (dunno why). I'd really like to have him in the group.
buttons - Like Rosy, I think she'll adopt a mother like figure. She's an unbelievably nice person but at the same time can be snappy and cause some commotion. The trolls would annoy her so much.
Immorality - Formally known as Emily! Anyone who has ever had to PM hre over an edit on the forum will know how angry she gets. She has one of the worst attitudes I have ever seen and ngl we'll have to probably kick her out so that will be a lot of fun LMAO!
Kyle - He created that big feedback thread earlier this month and I'd like him to be a part of it because no doubt he'll have something to say. He's very controversial and he mentioned he would hate to be i nthe jungle with like three other people on my list.
01-04-2014, 08:50 PM
Inseriousity.
Well I was only referring to agms and mods so if you did send an SOS it's a shame they didn't respond.
01-04-2014, 08:53 PM
Kardan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liva
@kardan; I what?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In the evictions, everytime you were up for eviction, you got the most votes.
01-04-2014, 08:53 PM
Phil
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kardan
Nice to see the numbers.
@Phil; How did evictions work in the case of a tie? I'm presuming you counted back through past evictions (The only reason I see @buttons; being evicted over @Ms.Aquamarine;) - but what would have happened if that wasn't possible? (For example, if I got one more vote in the eviction where I was evicted).
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottish
Right on the 6th screenshot you have both Ms.Aquamarine and buttons on 5 votes
how did you pick who got evicted and who stayed?
That was they day I messed up the voting and aside from that, Jen voted for herself when Rosy didn't so it wouldn't have been fair to evict them both.
01-04-2014, 08:57 PM
scottish
It would have as it's a vote, regardless if they vote for them self or not, it's a vote and it counts lol...
