Abortion

so we have finially come to an agreement- abortions MAY be nesicairy for underaged pregnancies, but what about women aged 20+ having abortions? is that simply being too klazy for domestic contreception? i simply think that that is wrong.

Well, besides the fact she should've been protected :@ I think she should be allowed. We can't say 21 or older can't have abortions, when 20 and 11 motnhs and younger can.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mendonky

so we have finially come to an agreement- abortions MAY be nesicairy for underaged pregnancies, but what about women aged 20+ having abortions? is that simply being too klazy for domestic contreception? i simply think that that is wrong.

---

I don't think the age should come into it. Most abortions are made because they we're to lazy to use contraception. That happens whether they're 14 or 40. But being older, they're more capable of havin a baby, they're old enough to know what they're doing, look after it and provide for it, so again, unless it's health related for the parent or baby, there's really no need for an abortion.

Well i agree in that you say younger kids wouldn't know aswell, but think of it this way : in the heat of one moment, a bad decission(we all make bad decisions), so we make her pay for 20 years?

people who can't accept having a baby aren't responsible!
And therefore not ready to be adults, taking responsibility.

having a baby at such a young age, does seem to be too big a burden for such a young child, that hasn;t mentally matured yet. it will also simply destroy their education that they may mave worked so hard to achieve. im not saying abortions should be handed out like candy, but sometimes they are nessicairy

Hard to understand what you are saying, but it is evil people who use abortion think of the infant as a thing not a living human being, they want to kill it with abortion, and do not think, they have the choice of the infant's life, and are not giving it a chance to live, which is evil! they are treating the infant as a thing a object that can come and go, its evil![/QUOTE]
How does that make them evil. When does a bundle of cells become i child?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by .mcgovlau.

Abortion should definetely be the girl's choice, she is having the baby, she should be able to pick and choose whether she wants it or not, come on why would you make a little girl go through child birth, thats just torture, you hear adults whining about labor and how bad it is, why would you make a little girl go through that??

---

How can it be JUST the girls choise. Its the fathers baby as well? are you saying he has no rights to let his own chilld live?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Butcher11

Personally, I think it should be allowed, and with the rape issue, how would you like to be a boyfriend, and find your girlfriend is pregnant with another man's baby? Eventually if she gave birth, then had kids with the boyfriend, the rapist child would be mistreated in some way. I believe the parents have the right to abort or not, and also, at the point they are "terminated" there is now life yet(not totally sure tho)

---

I just want to point out, its not the babys falt that its fatherer did somthing wrong,So hwo would getting rid of a baby chage naything. It did nothing wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mendonky

having a baby at such a young age, does seem to be too big a burden for such a young child, that hasn;t mentally matured yet. it will also simply destroy their education that they may mave worked so hard to achieve. im not saying abortions should be handed out like candy, but sometimes they are nessicairy

---

They are nessary, But people re\aly do need to learn to use contrseption, they bring any future problems on them sleves if they dont.

i am seriously in 2 minds abut this situation now.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mentor

How can it be JUST the girls choise. Its the fathers baby as well? are you saying he has no rights to let his own chilld live?

---

but it would be the mother carrying the child around for nine months, the father has the "easy job", he doesn;t have the child growing inside of him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mentor

I just want to point out, its not the babys falt that its fatherer did somthing wrong,So hwo would getting rid of a baby chage naything. It did nothing wrong.

---

but how could you live with the fact the that child's father did such a horriable thing to you? do u not understand the trauma that rape-victims go though in later life, and have that one thing that wll never let you forget it- the child.....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mendonky

i am seriously in 2 minds abut this situation now.



but it would be the mother carrying the child around for nine months, the father has the "easy job", he doesn;t have the child growing inside of him.

---

But he does stil stand to loose his child. tehre was a cort case where the father appled to svae it, becuse they had broken up, and teh mother dissed to temite the baby. the father lost the case and his child was killed, hed agree to look after and support it as soon as it was born so the next 18 years or so he would have be looking after it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mendonky

but how could you live with the fact the that child's father did such a horriable thing to you? do u not understand the trauma that rape-victims go though in later life, and have that one thing that wll never let you forget it- the child.....

---

But its the child facsing the consiqunces ebcuse of this, if its born ist resnted by the mother and given a bad life, if its not its dead. athogh death is probly teh prefeble option for the child, the mother would have to come to terms with killing an insent child for somthing someone else did

:eusa_thin *ponders*

i'm too young to be thinking about this sorta stuff!

if u were a girl, and u were raped, its bad enough having the memory of the incident, but everytime you look at ur child, you will see the rapist, how could you cope with that?