sony, Graphics x10 better, Nintendo's onli good for games lyk Mario - not my type
Printable View
sony, Graphics x10 better, Nintendo's onli good for games lyk Mario - not my type
sony, Graphics x10 better, Nintendo's onli good for games lyk Mario - not my type
EDIT: Got double posted for some reason, Sorry,
Why are some peoples reason for disliking Nintendo because of Mario? Mario isn't the DS "/ Really, the discussion for Sony Vs Nintendo is about game play, not the games on it "/
Is graphics the only thing people care about these days? And why is it that people tell off Ninendo's mascots, Play Station 3 is for shooting stuff and playing basketball, also should i remind you that only some
games are worth playing for the PS3 and its over priced, also ugly.
I like both companies.
oh great, we've got another sony fanboy who things graphics make a console..
mario by FAR isn't nintendo's only good games, they have such a wide variety but your obviously either too narrow-minded or idiotic to see that.
i know these games aren't exactly great but what about pokemon? i bet they've sold a few million.
nintendo always make great games + origional consoles + thats why they're better than sony, all they care about is bloody graphics.
look where thats got them;
the ps3 = so over priced they'll hardly sell any.
the psp = takes about 5 mins to load games!
as i've said before, the only good thing thats came from sony's console range is the ps2.
I think graphics are important but you put far too much importance to it. I agree a game should look good, but that should only come second to actual gameplay. Think about all the modified versions of tetris, I don't think a game like that has survived this long because of its visual aspects. Gameplay makes a game good, boosted with graphics you can make a good game great. Nintendo are very capable of decent graphics, BUT don't put too much importance on it.
I need to keep this alive.
Nintendo pwns j00