end of xp in a month and 11 days? I think

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jordy

lol I was the one who posted that. From what I know, Microsoft most probably wouldn't be here with out Apple and Apple wouldn't be here with out Microsoft :P

---

Shows how much I pay attention to names then, huh? :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jordy

You don't half plan ahead, Windows 10 will be around 2020-2025 :P

---

Oops I ment 7 lol.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tawm

And how many updates have been released since March 07 and now? :rolleyes:

---

What? Can you explain what you mean? I was saying I don't think vista is worth it when you look at the features and requirements.


Damn double post I'll contact a mod.

Edited by Kaotix12 (Forum Moderator): Posts merged, please be more careful next time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Klydo

Mac OS X is a million times better than Vista or XP. There is no competition between them. No viruses, no spyware, no crashing, no lag, no errors and no blue screen. Just face it, if it's Windows it sucks and sucks bad. Before you try and say "You don't get the same software for Mac", exactly you get lot better stuff. For example you don't get an Panic software for Windows. Without Panic I wouldn't be able to live. The only thing Windows has that Apple doesn't is users.

If you can't afford a Mac then that's your own fault not the people who can afford quality and performance.

---

My £800 rig (see sig) that runs Vista is gets alot more performance for the price. I would go for this over any ****** Mac. At least I can upgrade every component.

Funny, there are viruses, just not as many, there is spyware, just not as many, it does crash, you have to unplug it or some ****, not even a damn error screen to tell you whats wrong. And OSX does have BSOD equivalent.

Let me try and get 200FPS in Counter-Strike Source on an £800 iMac. I get 150 - 250FPS in CSS on my £800 rig that is better than a £1200 iMac. The only games Mac users see are ones Windows users have had for 4 years already.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Klydo

Okay so how come when I attempted to install Vista onto a "VISTA READY" laptop it failed 7 times before it even installed. Then once it was all I got was constant problems involving common software such as Adobe CS3. I even lost all sound as the sound drivers wouldn't work. I ended up having to revert to XP the same day. Where as when I upgraded from Tiger to Leopard it was a 40 minute install and that was it. I could continue on where I left off. It was so easy that I actually done it during my Software Development class. Nothing works on Vista where as everything works on Leopard, even Vista!

There is just no competition now, Vista is trying so, so hard to be like Mac OS and it's failing so much.

---

Proof or it didn't happen? I have installed Vista countless times on different setups first time, no trouble, even in BETA 1,2 and the RCs.

The full Adobe CS3 suite has installed perfectly fine on my rig? No problems there, and I think you will find that most CS3 users haven't had problems.

Get the right drivers.

Wow, funny, Vista takes a week to optimize before it can run at full speed. Go try it again.

Vista installs in 20 minutes for me, In 40 minutes I am fully up and running with all my programs and drivers installed.

Funny, everything works on Vista for me, any problems I have had is because I am using a 64bit version of it, so I just go and use it on my laptop instead. Even OSX works on my rig!


I haven't met anyone with their head so far up their own *** as you in quite a few months! Congratulations! Now get the hell out of the Technology section if you are just going to troll with useless Macintosh arguments!

Edited by SyrupyMonkey (Forum Moderator): Please try to be polite to all members, thanks :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tawm

My £800 rig (see sig) that runs Vista is gets alot more performance for the price. I would go for this over any ****** Mac. At least I can upgrade every component.

Funny, there are viruses, just not as many, there is spyware, just not as many, it does crash, you have to unplug it or some ****, not even a damn error screen to tell you whats wrong. And OSX does have BSOD equivalent.

Let me try and get 200FPS in Counter-Strike Source on an £800 iMac. I get 150 - 250FPS in CSS on my £800 rig that is better than a £1200 iMac. The only games Mac users see are ones Windows users have had for 4 years already.



Proof or it didn't happen? I have installed Vista countless times on different setups first time, no trouble, even in BETA 1,2 and the RCs.

The full Adobe CS3 suite has installed perfectly fine on my rig? No problems there, and I think you will find that most CS3 users haven't had problems.

Get the right drivers.

Wow, funny, Vista takes a week to optimize before it can run at full speed. Go try it again.

Vista installs in 20 minutes for me, In 40 minutes I am fully up and running with all my programs and drivers installed.

Funny, everything works on Vista for me, any problems I have had is because I am using a 64bit version of it, so I just go and use it on my laptop instead. Even OSX works on my rig!


I havn't met anyone with their head so far up their own *** as you in quite a few months! Congratulations! Now get the hell out of the Technology section if you are just going to troll with useless Macintosh arguments!

---

Good comeback :P

owned?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DaveTaylor//

owned?

---

That was more then owned.

I hate Fanboys and Trolls.

I'm expecting a bucket full of infractions now.

He is the definition of "Apple up the ****"

I love XP ima buy Pro before it goes. ++ It's true Microsoft wouldn't be here without Apple because Bill Gates worked for Apple for a short time, and during that time, he stole the clickable icons and integrated them with Windows:O

I swear it was Steve Jobs who worked for MS?