bit-tech are very trusted news sources which actually do reliable tests. I will wait to see what they say before i think of downloading it as a main operating system
Printable View
bit-tech are very trusted news sources which actually do reliable tests. I will wait to see what they say before i think of downloading it as a main operating system
Seeing as you've never owned A Mac and therefore never used OSX as your main OS or you've never used every last Linux Distro on the planet suitable for a desktop, I'd say that your statement is ridiculously stupid.
Before responding to a post, read the entire thread. As I previously stated I already tried Windows 7. It was faster than Vista but slower than XP.In your own opinion it's better. Then again you said you want the latest and greatest from everything. Therefore you probably think it's better than XP because it's newer.You've failed to elaborate.Any negative things you say about Macs I'll simply ignore. You have never owned a Mac, therefore you're not able to judge them properly. Until you've actually had the experience of using a Mac and OSX any remarks you make about them are irrelevant and completely pointless.
As long as you're running a bloated unstable operating system your PC is as good as crap IMO.Never in a million years would I even suggest that you take tech seriously, or even remotely know what you're talking about. Therefore you wouldn't know; sorry!So a tech blog in 7 different languages with an Alexa rating of 1,360 is just guys reviewing games? Out of the 15 articles on their homepage, not one is reviewing games. Your obvious stupidity regarding Engadget just proves my point. You don't know anything about Engadget, but since I praised Engadget and you want to continue this argument, you have to flame Engadget.
I think if I showed this thread to any MacRumor forum users, Engadget viewers or even CNET viewers they'd most likely think you were a joke. In all the years I've been at HxF I've never seen such a misguided user in the Technology section. Walk out side, throw away your computer. Try doing something you're good at.
Sorry are you mentally ill, I use OS X, Linux and Windows regularly, Linux not so much, you don't need a mac to use OS X.
Herp de derp more people have said it's faster.
It's an expression chuckles.
They make operating systems.
Hurf durf using a mac is just like any other pc, just with a UNIBODY ALUMINIUM CASE.
Let's put it this way, I've been using OS X on and off for more than 2 years now ;)
I would, I do, I build therefore I am.
Already done that. Move along and get with the times.
MacRumor users are all idiots that LOEV THE MAC like it's some sort of futuristic machine from the year 3000 (no, they do not live underwater).
Engadget viewers are just there to look at the shiny pictures.
Who cares about CNET?
Also, as you seem quite content about going on about this "misguided" thing, I've been dealing with tech problems, fixing pcs, doodling with macs and such, building machines and testing them for several years, I think I'm a wee bit more qualified than you to rant about useless hardware in macs and useless software in OS X.
The ball is in your court now boy, lets see you cloud my experience over with "HURF DURF JSUT CAUSE YOU USE PC FOR YEARS DOESN'T MEAN U CAN REVIEW!!!!!!!!! AND JUGE OS X"
Yes it does, yes I do, yes I can.
Nah XP will be faster by far, so why change :P
Pardon me for not assuming that you fail to abide by the law.herp de derp, smarter people have said it isn't.
You abide by it, expression or not.
It's an expression chuckles.
People who can afford real Macs and don't wish to be in Pystar's shoes actually buy a Mac manufactured by Apple. I'm one of these people.
BUUUUUUUR. Wrong;).
Not a worthy response to what I said at all.
Yeah, especially the users in the Windows section who love Windows 7 as much as you?
Another case of opposing what I like to continue arguing.
You're not some tech god we're all going to worship. Based on what you post I'd say you're not at all more qualified than me. There are a lot more users in the tech section smarter and more experienced than you.
You say you fix pcs and screw around with computers as if nobody else in this section does either. Don't make the mistake of thinking that you're the only user in this section who thinks they're "tech savy".Once again you assume you're the only one with experience working with computers. In your case I'd even say your experience doesn't speak for much, as a lot of what you say are the words of an idiot.
You've not said anything logical, nor have you provided me with any proof that what you're saying is genuine. Do you think by saying irrational things and not providing proof is a plausible thing to do? Do you think people will believe you when you can't be bothered to even attempt to to prove what you're saying is genuine?
Stop making funny sounds at me, and start being logical thanks;).
Thankyou for pressing enter twice after each quote, it makes it much easier for me to reply.
Like you do?
No they haven't. Tech sites != smarter people.
No I don't.
My computer is far less expensive expensive than a "Mac" and yet performs so very much better, who's the smart one here?
Wrong.
Considering what I can tell from several members of this forum I've asked and their attitude to you, "eat ****" would be a worthy response to most of your posts. Not that I'd answer with that.
I don't "Love" Windows 7, I just like it. I don't know where you're getting this love crap from I see a good OS I praise a good OS.
That's the whole point of an argument, opposition.
Sure there are, I'm just one of the smarter ones is all. And I'd imagine (Seeming as Dave did, and he's probably one of the smartest ones) they'd agree with me about 7 aswell.
It's meant towards you muffin cakes, that's the point of an argument, to use points against each other until one either admits defeat or the argument comes to a point where there is nothing to argue about anymore.
They're the words of a well trained gentleman.
Do you know what logical means? Apparently not. (Don't wikipedia it).
You're welcome.I haven't, nor will I pirate OSX.I spot an error in your code. I would trust a tech site reviewer who gets paid to do reviews and is experienced doing reviews over some arrogant kid on HxF.Yes you do.I have a nice all in one unit, running a genuine non-illegal operating system with an ALUMINUM BODY CASE. Obviously price doesn't matter to me, though if it did I could justify that the HP all-in-one equivalent of an iMac is in the same price range. Also, I can justify that the extra money is worth it, as I'm getting a much more secure and stable operating system.Don't you mean BUUUUUUR wrong?They must not be very smart users, if they'd tell someone else to eat ****You love it because it's the latest operating system from Microsoft.disagreeing with someone for the sake of disagreeing. You're very mature.Well....you made me laugh. The stupidity you've shown us in this thread alone is enough to justify that you're not one of the smarter ones.You should also back up your claims as well as you can. This you've failed to do.Don't flatter me.You certainly don't know what logical means. Half of what you say are your bias opinions. When you do try to say a fact it's typically wrong, and unsupported by evidence.
I wasn't on about just OS X.
pseudocode
I wouldn't trust them, nor would I trust the kid, but then again I'm not a kid I'm an expert programmer.
No I don't.
I have a nice powerful computer running a genuine non-illegal operating system with a HARD STEEL CASE. And blue LEDs to make it go faster.
OS X isn't any more stable than Windows Vista on the right hardware. You're paying for overpriced off-the-shelf hardware. Enjoy doing that.
No I mean Wrong.
They're a lot smarter than you are.
I don't love it at all.
To put it in your words "disagreeing with someone for the sake of disagreeing. You're very mature."
No you're just seeing stupidity cause you're dim, and that's what this argument is about, dim people arguing with non dim people.
:toot: most things can be found by googling! google is a useful tool.
I was referring to myself. Not that you'd pick up on that :)
All I have to say to that is: Intentional Logical Fallacies.
Windows 7 is faster than XP.
Fact.
Move on.