9/11 Conspiracies - What do you think happened? - [Closes 13/05/07]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by WiiCamy

I'm really nt sure anymore those videos and stuff really are starting to turn me round, bt i think ill need concrete evidence b4 i believe it
Btw I went on a plane for the first time the day after the atacks :O
and we had a 12 hour delay so i was basically ******* myself lol

---

No you never, all flights everywhere were grounded. No matter where, they were still grounded. Even Iran.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ScottDiamond

No you never, all flights everywhere were grounded. No matter where, they were still grounded. Even Iran.

---

+ Rep For Owning Him <3

The Loose change and things like Fahrenheit 9/11 make good strong points, the government were up to something I think.

The hole in the pentagon was small and the Towers collapsed like a controlled demolition.

The chances that two towers would collapse in the same way after being hit by two massive jet's is strange, in reality the fire on the side which the plane hit would be hotter than the other side meaning the top half of the building would collapse one way rather than ontop of itself.

THEJEWSDIDIT(PAUSEWAITFORAWE):D


Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): As this is a debate you should back up your statement with a reasoned arguement as to why you think they did otherwise it does look somewhat racist.
Thx:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 503nomis

THEJEWSDIDIT(PAUSEWAITFORAWE):D

---

omg they blatently did.

i find it amazing everybody is clutching onto this loose change thing, when most of it has been proved to be crap.

whats to debate :S

two planes hit two buildings = people die.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ScottDiamond

No you never, all flights everywhere were grounded. No matter where, they were still grounded. Even Iran.

---

lol, i think i wud know if i was on a plane or nt
They werent grounded at glasgow :/

Its a very controversial topic to start a debate on but I agree with Undertaker.

I watched "The Conspiracy Files" on BBC 2 a while back and their evidence was really overwhelming but when you think about it, and think about it logically. Why would America want to many of its own people to die, and if you remember watching when it happened on the news and looking at the papers after it you will remember about all the suffering and how people actually jumped out of the windows.

So, I think that it was down to terrorism but there is a lot of evidence to suggest other wise. I dont think we will ever know the full truth about what happened on that day.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ActiveVision

Its a very controversial topic to start a debate on but I agree with Undertaker.

I watched "The Conspiracy Files" on BBC 2 a while back and their evidence was really overwhelming but when you think about it, and think about it logically. Why would America want to many of its own people to die, and if you remember watching when it happened on the news and looking at the papers after it you will remember about all the suffering and how people actually jumped out of the windows.

So, I think that it was down to terrorism but there is a lot of evidence to suggest other wise. I dont think we will ever know the full truth about what happened on that day.

---

Money. =]

Watch The Start Of Loose Change

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by mattmeister

whats to debate :S

two planes hit two buildings = people die.

---

The debate is, that some people say it was hijackers on planes. And others have a theory that the world trade centre was planted with bombs which was supposedly the cause of them fallling to the ground when experts said it should have held!