Sky dragon 6T what the ****?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by xuxu

immenseman cant do the job correctly

---

lol mani, you weren't saying that when you were begging for your job back :D. Love you really x

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jonathans

I remember a screeny of you saying you would fix the value of something. Was in one of W7's discussions.

---

Sarcasm mate, if you believe Pleke then you need to sort out some mental issues.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Immenseman

At post above, it also had something along the lines of -insert laugh here- at the end which clearly shows sarcasm. That's if we're thinking of the same one anyway.



You're such a babe :8

---

-blushes-

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wig44.

That's bull. Your theorycrafting is awful. If people were trading the dragon at 6-7ts then it wouldn't be put to 12 thrones that is just you wanting the price to go up. You don't price something on it'd history and the purple icms are never seen now hence why they are valued much higher. Sorry but you just want the price to go up for you and your 'friends' who have the dragons.

---

Quite the opposite man, my friends were the first people who had these dragons and have sold them for 18T. But rare values are not just based on the successful trades, its what people would be willing to offer for them, then you get the average and thats your value. And my theorys are reliable, its common sense to say that if there are less of these than these, then that furni is "rarer" because of how many there are. And what is with purple ICM's are never seen now? thats a load of rubbish tbh. Sure, not many are being traded, so that means it should be higher than 8T because if one is offered for trade, people will really want it and pay highly. Sky drags are being sold for 6-8/9T, previously traded for 18T, there are 6 of them, 20 purple ICM's which are priced 8T, thats nearly the same, so already two of your facts are incorrect. Also, im not saying you should put a value on an item because of its history, im saying if you put it at this value, the value would be reasonable because of its history.

For example, lets say a new furni came out and there was only one of them on habbo, then the owner sold it for a price like 20T. The next person wants to sell it for 1T, so he does. The next people sell it for that price aswell so the value it has been given is 1T. So do you think that furni of which there is only one of them should deserve to be priced like that? I dont think so.

This story is similar with sky drag, 6 of them, sold at 18T each. Next people sell at 7T so value should be 7T? even though there are only 6 of them, which is a very small amount? no it shouldnt, should be much higher, not 18T because people are selling lower, but a price like 12T so it seems reasonable to the customer and "respectful" if you like to the furni. Anyway, its only 5T more, so stop moaning.

These are more than valid points im making, so think about what your going to say before you intimidate someone, thank you ------->:eusa_thin<-------

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Exelglug

Quite the opposite man, my friends were the first people who had these dragons and have sold them for 18T. But rare values are not just based on the successful trades, its what people would be willing to offer for them, then you get the average and thats your value. And my theorys are reliable, its common sense to say that if there are less of these than these, then that furni is "rarer" because of how many there are. And what is with purple ICM's are never seen now? thats a load of rubbish tbh. Sure, not many are being traded, so that means it should be higher than 8T because if one is offered for trade, people will really want it and pay highly. Sky drags are being sold for 6-8/9T, previously traded for 18T, there are 6 of them, 20 purple ICM's which are priced 8T, thats nearly the same, so already two of your facts are incorrect. Also, im not saying you should put a value on an item because of its history, im saying if you put it at this value, the value would be reasonable because of its history.

For example, lets say a new furni came out and there was only one of them on habbo, then the owner sold it for a price like 20T. The next person wants to sell it for 1T, so he does. The next people sell it for that price aswell so the value it has been given is 1T. So do you think that furni of which there is only one of them should deserve to be priced like that? I dont think so.

This story is similar with sky drag, 6 of them, sold at 18T each. Next people sell at 7T so value should be 7T? even though there are only 6 of them, which is a very small amount? no it shouldnt, should be much higher, not 18T because people are selling lower, but a price like 12T so it seems reasonable to the customer and "respectful" if you like to the furni. Anyway, its only 5T more, so stop moaning.

These are more than valid points im making, so think about what your going to say before you intimidate someone, thank you ------->:eusa_thin<-------

---

There are 20 Purple ICM'S but only a few remain, the others are on banned accounts, people who have left and some won't sell.

So there are NOT 20 Purple ICM's, it's harder to get a Purple ICM than a Sky Dragon. You also say it seem's reasonable to higher it due to rareity, but people WILL NOT PAY 12 THRONES for something just because Habbox says it should be 12T, hence why supers drop and rise so much.

On your point of the one furni being sold for 1T, yes it would be that price because it's the most recent one sold - it's the way it is - DEAL with it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

There are 20 Purple ICM'S but only a few remain, the others are on banned accounts, people who have left and some won't sell.

So there are NOT 20 Purple ICM's, it's harder to get a Purple ICM than a Sky Dragon. You also say it seem's reasonable to higher it due to rareity, but people WILL NOT PAY 12 THRONES for something just because Habbox says it should be 12T, hence why supers drop and rise so much.

On your point of the one furni being sold for 1T, yes it would be that price because it's the most recent one sold - it's the way it is - DEAL with it.

---

Yes, SOME are on banned accounts, but only on some. a "some" amount would be between 5-10 furni, so there will be still more ICM's than drags. And i assure you, MOST PEOPLE OFFER AN AMOUNT BY LOOKING AT HABBOX VALUES. Every person ive offered this furni to have said 'Look at habbox', so if habbox said 12T people would give it in order to get it.
And really, are you being serious with your last sentence? if you are, your most definitely wrong. Rare values are values on their RAREITY, not what they are traded for alone, otherweise they would be called "What rares are being traded for Values". Like i said, think before your post before you start intimidating someone, DEAL with it, thank you ------->:eusa_thin<-------

I FINK ITZ A SKRIPTED

I FINK PRICE TOO HIGH CUZ WOT IF UR ONLI A BABY U WONT BE RICH

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Exelglug

Yes, SOME are on banned accounts, but only on some. a "some" amount would be between 5-10 furni, so there will be still more ICM's than drags. And i assure you, MOST PEOPLE OFFER AN AMOUNT BY LOOKING AT HABBOX VALUES. Every person ive offered this furni to have said 'Look at habbox', so if habbox said 12T people would give it in order to get it.
And really, are you being serious with your last sentence? if you are, your most definitely wrong. Rare values are values on their RAREITY, not what they are traded for alone, otherweise they would be called "What rares are being traded for Values". Like i said, think before your post before you start intimidating someone, DEAL with it, thank you ------->:eusa_thin<-------

---

I am being serious with my last sentence because that is what rare values are, the rate of what rares are being sold for.

Rare values were never based on rareity in numbers, but if you think Sky Dragons should be more than Purple ICM's, then shouldn't Black Lasers and Red Lasers be more than thrones? would you pay 60 CS for a Black/Red Laser? Shouldn't the Strobe Solarium be at least 4T as there are less of them compared with Dino's and Birdbaths? you fail to understand that people will not pay this much just because of rareity, that's why the Green Pillow hit 28 CS and now is just 8 CS yet there are 50,000 Thrones and just 820 Green Pillows.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

I am being serious with my last sentence because that is what rare values are, the rate of what rares are being sold for.

---

No, you are wrong, they are not a rate at what they are sold for. Look, let me tell you something. There is an episode of "spongebob squarepants" where there is this soda drinking hat worth around $1 million which was given away for free to spongebob by Mr Krabs. Krabs found out the hats real amount because people offered this price for it, and tries to get it back from spongebob. When he does eventually get it back, people refuse to give him this price because a whole factory full of these hats were found and so they were worthless. This proves Quantity matters to something's value, not just what people are offering for it.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

Rare values were never based on rareity in numbers, but if you think Sky Dragons should be more than Purple ICM's, then shouldn't Black Lasers and Red Lasers be more than thrones? would you pay 60 CS for a Black/Red Laser?

---

They should be that price if there are much less of them in quantity than thrones. It was given out in a Ukash deal, so i wouldnt consider it a super rare because loads of people may have bought the offer. If it has the price it has now, it should really be under normal rares. Unless there is a significant difference between the amount of thrones and lazer gates, then i would buy a lazer for 60 CS if thats what habbox recommended.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

Shouldn't the Strobe Solarium be at least 4T as there are less of them compared with Dino's and Birdbaths? you fail to understand that people will not pay this much just because of rareity, that's why the Green Pillow hit 28 CS and now is just 8 CS yet there are 50,000 Thrones and just 820 Green Pillows.

---

Wheres the proof that there are less of them compared to dinos and BB's? sure they were only out for 5 mins but which 5 mins? could of been when habbo was almost full. If there are less, it should be super and yes, should be around 4T . I understand perfectly that its just not totally based on rareity, but its not totally based on whats being offered either, as i proved earlier. And about the green pillows, they used to be 28 CS and then went down to 8 because the amount of green pillows in the hotel was increasing. So the relationship is : The Higher The Quantity, The Smaller The Amount. You actually lead me onto another point, theres so many thrones so the price of them should go down quite a bit. Your arguments are based around them to argue about other furni not being priced highly enough, but this also means that the throne value is too high and should go down drastically, which is the answer to all your problems tbh.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

No I answear questions on rares to people who ask Sam, I know there won't be questions on Habbo in exams, it's a game.

If Habbo ever does start to affect my exams then i'll be gone from it as soon as it does, I wasn't on my GCSE years while Manager so it's not the same as the position you were in.

Suprised you didn't say all this while in the department Sam?

---

It wasn't really my place to comment on it then.
Anyway, it wasn't even a big deal when I was in the Department. It just got sad when you were still so enthusiastic prior to your firing and also, it was just your mad cry-campaign when you turned so Anti-Habbox just because you lost your job...
Although to keep such enthusiasm after it all does need some applause... Even if it is still in Habbo and Rare Values.

habbox rare page control the rares not thew otherway round, sad truth