i dont think its unfair, if stuff was unfair, then people would be saying MaG on ps3 is unfair, and that it should be 360 exclusive same as gran tursimo 5, but they aint, so get over it. you get the maps later on anyway
Printable View
i dont think its unfair, if stuff was unfair, then people would be saying MaG on ps3 is unfair, and that it should be 360 exclusive same as gran tursimo 5, but they aint, so get over it. you get the maps later on anyway
That's called an exclusive. PS3 fanboys aren't saying that Halo on XBOX is unfair. It's the fact both consoles are getting the same game, but 1 console gets the DLC for that game first. Anyway XBOX must've paid them for that, Sony should've as 40% of PS3 online players will probably be on MW2.Quote:
Originally Posted by HC0R3H00LIH00P
Yeah but MAG is a PS3 exclusive, it can only be done on the PS3, COD:MW2 is multiplatform and all platforms should get the same content.Quote:
Originally Posted by HC0R3H00LIH00P
I'm not fussed since I have both.
im not fussed since i have all 3, but still, if sony wanted the maps first, they should bid for them?
Companies shouldn't have to pay for content for their own platform, a publisher/developer would make more money just going multiplatform. Even with exclusivity deals.
Yeah but Xbox360 is more suited to FPS than PS3. Why do you think MLG and Gamebattles for CoD4 are only on 360?
I think ps3 is more suited to driving games, due to the trigger and button sensitivity thing, and six axis
How is xbox more suited to fps? The controllers are pretty much the same except they look slightly different and ps3 has six axis.
Also to HC0R3H00LIH00P I'm not saying exclusivity for a game is unfair, it's just the multiplatform dlcs of which is exclusive to one console. Plus how can sony compare to microsoft? Lol
The ps3's controller has a completeley different layout, The triggers are curved downwards, which is bad for fps and the analogue's are straight, which i think is more difficult to use.
Your saying Dlc to microsoft first for a month is unfair, which it isnt, microsoft paid for it, its a MONTH for god sake, sony cannot compare to microsoft thats the thing, microsoft are the bigger company
Quote me or argue against me, i wont reply tyvm ;)
This arguement is going no where, as Paul said the xbox was born for FPS games really, with Microsoft thinking Halo would be the main franchise for the 360 still they probably designed the controller with Halo in mind, where as Sony designed the controller to try fit everything, personally I find the PS3 controller better for beat 'em ups since the buttons are a little easier to push in.
It's not unfair at all, you still get the maps and if you want them a month earlier just get an xbox and quit complaining, a very, very large amount of xbox users will be on it, personally I would expect more 360 users on it than PS3 users, I really doubt it's 40% for PS3 anyway, maybe like 20% since alot of people don't like FPS games, 360 has more CoD fans than the PS3 due to the earlier release of the console and the fact they'd get 360 for CoD2 and CoD3, quite possibly keeping it for 4 and 5.