Vegetarianism?

My view:

Meats tastes nice, end of story.

Meh i like my meat "/ vegiratism is pointless really, if you dont like the taste fair enogh, But in realty, its unhealthy and isnt helping any animals "/
For a start most the species eaten wouldnt even exist if it wernt for are need to eat them, they get quick painless deaths as opposed to the long painful ones nature supplys "/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Craig

I have all the views of a vegetarian I just can't become one!

---

Yeah same, I just can't live without chicken.

I just tried veggie burgers :D they're flipping nice lol

I used to not understand why vegetarians ate fish, and I found 1 reason for some vegitarians to eat fish. It depends on their cause. If they feel its wrong to eat animals, they cant eat fish. If they dont like the way farm animals are treated, and their vegitarianism is a protest, then fish is okay.

Our family is starting to turn to vegetarianism, however we still eat meat for nutrients. No purpose, we are just getting a bit sick of the price for lack of quality. (No, you idiots who think meat is bad for you, meat IS good for you if proportions are used apropriately.) When I go to college however, I'll be eating less. I just don't like the taste.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HellyBelly

really? ;o
that's weirdddd

---

yea it was on a science test a while back :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Romance

I'm a vegaterian,I have been for five years, I don't eat meat because I don't feel the need to, as there is plenty of substitutes, and I couldn't personally eat an animal.
However, I don't believe that people who eat meat are 'murderers' As the human species are omnivores, meaning they needto eat both Vegtables and meat to survive. So eating meat is more natural than being vegaterian as that is how our bodys are designed.

---

i know lol hence the canines i just thought my post was a bit weak so i thought id throw in a bit of accusations

hmmmm i wanna start an arguement i know who the best for getting angry is lol
So mentor lol
Nature supplies a NATURAL death you talk about the food chain but animals are supposed to be wild and free not mass culled. You wouldnt say ummm a rabbit has a long and painful death instead of a quick one would you cause they are free as nature intended.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ozzie

Nature supplies a NATURAL death you talk about the food chain but animals are supposed to be wild and free not mass culled. You wouldnt say ummm a rabbit has a long and painful death instead of a quick one would you cause they are free as nature intended.

---

I already waiting to something to start a debate on :D althogh i would usealy have waited for something a little better...

1) Rabbits are eaten commonly by humans? notice the furry things hanging in the majorty of butchers?

2) Remember humans created mixamotisis the desise respoancable for the painful death of Millions of rabbits, becuse they were a pest? if more ate them that woulnt be so.. and rabbits would have had far less painfull deaths, The desises is unnatural. us eating them Is natral

3) humans are part of the food chain, we work in much the same way, but are population has long been far to massive to be sustinaed via natral means, Under the laws of nature, humans would eat the food, food would get scarse, humans starve, the food populations rise again.
But since humans dont want to die, and are smart enogh to get around the problem, We farm animals so as to forfill are own nutritinal needs and not die?
If your vergitaion becuse you want to react normaly, youd be more accuret by ceaseing to eat full stop, or maybe takeing a trip to africa so you can get mauled by a lion, since humans aint nessarly the top of the chain at all times "/
Althogh the natrual there, is still unnatral, since humans are naturaly interlignet, and natraly use that inteligence to benifit themselves :)

4) painless death by humans, for eating. Slowly ripped appart and eaten alive by a fox or something, then eaten... not a hard choise imo

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Romance

I'm a vegaterian,I have been for five years, I don't eat meat because I don't feel the need to, as there is plenty of substitutes, and I couldn't personally eat an animal.
However, I don't believe that people who eat meat are 'murderers' As the human species are omnivores, meaning they needto eat both Vegtables and meat to survive. So eating meat is more natural than being vegaterian as that is how our bodys are designed.

---

Can't edit now, but I ment 'arn't murderers' :]

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Romance

Can't edit now, but I ment 'arn't murderers' :]

---

wait im confused?
I don't believe that people who eat meat are 'murderers'
People who eat meat are NOT murders

with correction
I don't believe that people who eat meat arn't 'murderers'
People who eat meat are Murders


Im kinda confused which your actaly intending to mean, since context wize the first seemed to make much more sence, which could indecated your rephrasing based on a misread?