Printable View
The last time I looked, I wasn't a carrot Bef :P lol. I just hope I haven't made any enemies on this forum as I hate doing that and it seriously isn't in my nature, so I'd like to publicly apologise to Entor, I think both of our substancial debates are on two beliefs, that of the person who studies the paranormal, and that who studies the termonology of scientific prospection.
Going to a library does not prove a study took place at your house, which included a load of MP's, Scientists and a priest.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bliss
Provide evidence that this study took place, with real MP's, scientists and priests, at your big country house.
IF people conduct a study theres evidence, at least that the study took place, if the study is not recording data, its not a study is it, its a pointless waste of time.
If you cannot you are a: fraud and Lier
Innit bub. You seemed to care for infractions, prepare for one! :) DOUBLE POST!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bliss
it means donkey. ;) not bottom. And that was by me.
Yehh id be intrested in viewing your paranormal site thingys and seeing what evidence you do have, like i said, i dont know if there are ghosts or not as i havnt ever had one come up to me and be like
"Hi Bef im a ghost"
But im intrested in this sort of stuff
Entor, I will do my best to find you some evidence tomorrow but right now I have to go to bed. I'll pm you tomorrow after I have came across some which I'm sure I will. PS: It was only the local MP - Nothing big like tony blair or gordon brown.
I'll also PM you, Bef with the details of the Sites and my Forum, ;) I find it applaudable that you take interest in these things. It's good that you want to learn about strong possibilities of the nature of spiritual beings and paranormal investigations.
I think theres something like ghosts, but I'm not "siding" with Bliss cos shes acting like a jack *** (donkey).Quote:
Originally Posted by Bef
BTW Bef, can you speak Welsh? I'm 1/4 welsh, I've been there and it was raining lol. :(
Not fluent fluent but im ok. Half my family speak it as there first language. Im no good at writing it mind,Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagz
Awesome! It looks very difficult lol. Do many people speak it in Wales, like in the towns..?Quote:
Originally Posted by Bef
Not as a first language in south (wher i live) But they do more in other parts of Wales.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jagz
Its cumpolsory all over wales in schools though.
Unless your implying you local MP has a weight problem im skeptical i counts as "members of parliament" on his own.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bliss
So it already appears that much of it was a lie.
Strong possibly is again a flawed concept, without any objective facts all that remains is a possibly. That possibly is then entirely reliant on the possibly soles can exist, dualism has been heavly debunked for a few 100 years now, so it in a straight form cannot be used to account for what is captured under the term "ghost"Quote:
I'll also PM you, Bef with the details of the Sites and my Forum, ;) I find it applaudable that you take interest in these things. It's good that you want to learn about strong possibilities of the nature of spiritual beings and paranormal investigations.
It is also a contradiction to refer to such activity's as para-normal, since normal simply means the state of affairs the world is under at present, if ghosts exist, then there normal, not para-normal. Para-normal stuff becomes normal if its real, so from usage of that term you assert it is false.
All possibilities are interesting, and ghosts or what is classically falsely deemed as para-normal is one of those which takes particular attention in light of possible implications and cultural saturation. In a simlar way to theist beliefs.
Its because im interested in the subjects its so easy for me to tell when someone doesn't have a clue what the hell there rambling on about, hence why your arguments were so easly to destroy and so massively flawed. Matrealist are duelist, mind is still there (ignore elimative-matrealist for now), use it and actually think about the practical implications and problems surrounding what your talking about, and how far evidence if such claims were true would support them, and then how the lack of such evidence leaves major problems for the theory.
Your hypothesis should reflect the evidence, trying to make evidence fit the hypothesis as you are doing, simply garentees failure.