What changes should we make to the forum rules?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David

forum change: the rep limit

---

Even better: Remove rep and get a like system!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RyRy

That's actually a good change, I haven't seen anything changed under Phil's reign (no offence Phil) and I can't help but wonder whether that's due to overly controlling management (that also includes co-owners for those with a victim complex).

The fact is Habbox is HabboxForum now for the most part, but it'll always stay that way as long as most of the management focus on the forum itself. If you had management span out further and look towards Habbo and improving the site, you may find you get an increase in users that way. Leave the Forum Manager to manage the forum, else just do away with the job and have GM, AGMs and Co-owners manage it themselves. Do we still have an Assistant Forum Manager by the way? I assume not as it'd be harder to puppeteer two people.

Problem is though you've recommended it at a time when people are overly salty about what's happened to Dan, so a good idea is going to be marked by hissyfitting (as demonstrated above my post).

---

Phil can do pretty much whatever he likes with little interference from anyone above him.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wispur

Even better: Remove rep and get a like system!

---

good idea, could they hate you any more right now even if you did?

http://31.media.tumblr.com/cbdd033de...r79k32_500.gif

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbgtz

Right but we don't even know who reported him. They could be randomers who signed up just to complain for all we know and they're not going to post more than him. I feel we should follow Habbo and just encourage users to ignore others (hiding sigs, avatars or blocking users outright which I think can be done). Anyone could literally be offended by anything and I think this is a poor decision because of that.

Also a slightly unrelated point, I find it funny that Zitrones post of the ISIS flag was removed but mines still there lmao. Oh it's also funny that the thread was closed.

---

Not forgetting that although what causes offence is subjective and varies from person to person, if you are being offended by something you are being mistaken by, you're just looking like an idiot. You shouldn't be offended by a State Flag just because you're dumb enough to mistake it for the Confederate Flag. Facilitating it like Wispur and his supposed team have done doesn't reflect well on them either, especially when Wispur refuses to accept he is wrong and just closes the thread. I thought Habbox got over hiring arrogant GMs. Just tell those who complained that they are mistaken! It's better than rolling with it and refusing to accept you are wrong.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wispur

Phil can do pretty much whatever he likes with little interference from anyone above him.

---

Good, then stop interfering with his department and have him revert this rule which apparently came in based on your lack of knowledge of the Confederation. Have you apologised to Undertaker yet?

Omfg if you start this rep vs like debate AGAIN....

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Wispur

Even better: Remove rep and get a like system!



Phil can do pretty much whatever he likes with little interference from anyone above him.

---

In your opinions thread, mdport. made it sound otherwise :P

"The Events scenario that you blamed on everyone else but yourself pissed me off quite a bit. After that it became clear that you like to call all the shots but like having someone by your side that you can blame it on if it all goes pear-shaped. If it goes well, then you'll take the credit for it. You don't seem to want to let go of the Forum Manager or AGM Staff roles, as you still either have a massive input in decisions made or you still have that role entirely."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by David

good idea, could they hate you any more right now even if you did?

http://31.media.tumblr.com/cbdd033de...r79k32_500.gif

---

Probably not :P

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Inseriousity.

In your opinions thread, mdport. made it sound otherwise :P

"The Events scenario that you blamed on everyone else but yourself pissed me off quite a bit. After that it became clear that you like to call all the shots but like having someone by your side that you can blame it on if it all goes pear-shaped. If it goes well, then you'll take the credit for it. You don't seem to want to let go of the Forum Manager or AGM Staff roles, as you still either have a massive input in decisions made or you still have that role entirely."

---

Yeah I dont know what made him say that so I would be interested to know why.

Me too (yeah I'm just nosy). @mdport.;

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dbgtz

Looks like you'd be one of the first then :O
http://i.imgur.com/3nK1t3J.png

---

That's a funny looking picture of the forum you've got there

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by GommeInc

Why demean the forum by the ignorance of a few?

---

I agree, Dan should have been banned long ago

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FlyingJesus

I agree, Dan should have been banned long ago

---

He hasn't been banned and shouldn't be unless he actually breaks some rules. He didn't break the rules with the signature he had!

Also, talk about the pot calling the kettle black. You say slander is bad yet you call everyone a racist who supports Dan. Hardly admirable.

No I don't, please don't slander me by suggesting I've said things which I haven't