Harry Potter RUBBISH film.

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix is the worse Harry Potter film I have ever seen, it is rushed and here is a list of the rubbish things :

Show Hide

• Quidditch cut out completely
• All of the rooms at the ministry are missed out for example the room with the brains and the time room
• St.Mungo's is cut out completely
• No Gildery Lockhart
• Mrs Figg an absolutely appalling actress
• No howler for Petunia Dursley
• Grimauld Place only appears twice and for a short time
• No Boggart and Mrs Weasley
• Sirius' Mum's portrait only appears once and behind a curtain
• Neville doesn't get tortured by Bellatrix Lestrange
• No interview in the Quibbler with Rita Skeeter and Harry
• Only a tiny mention of OWLs and exams
• No Freinz teaching Divination
• No nearly headless Nick
• No two way mirrors
• A radio in hogwarts with chart music? Electronics don't work at hogwarts and why chart music? Why not the Weird Sisters or other wizarding bands
• No prefects
• Cho's friend doesn't appear or snitch on the DA instead Cho confesses to Umbridge under a truth potion

So I would rate the film a 3/10 mainly because it had good special effects and normally I would rate the films highly but this one was absolutely dreadful which is surprising considering I found the 5th book the best and bad news David Yates is directing the 6th film so I am expecting the same.

i know. i thought it was the worst film that has been made for harry potter. total piece of crap and a waste of money and time.

i didn't think the last one was any good so, yeah, i don't really have any high hopes for that one.

my sister was saying about cho confessing in this film and i was like, doesn't the girl do it & get all spots for talking? and she was like no..
i hate it when they miss things out.

this is why i read the books before i even thought of seeing the films.

Yeah Cho's friend was completely cut out :X
Biggest load of crap ever :@

Hmm, seeing as it was a VERY long book then they obv had to cut some bits out.
Personally i think all the Potter books could have been better. Like in the last one they missed out dobby entirely and he is the best and winky!!

i aint seen it yet and i wont be rushing to the cinema. Im not expecting it to be brill. The potter films r just a laugh really.

I liked it.

They cant put EVERYTHING in or else it would be 18 hours long, and people would complain about that. so the producers cant win.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RedStratocas

I liked it.

They cant put EVERYTHING in or else it would be 18 hours long, and people would complain about that. so the producers cant win.

---

I know they can't put everything in but if you check my extensive list, I find the things I put were vital, well most of them anyway.

They did cut a lot but this book was twice as long as the third book and it would have been at least 5 hours if they wanted to put all those things in, I would have happily sat through 5 hours but most people wouldn't.

so, in goblet of fire they missed out the whole winky storyline

which was like the main part of the book and good character building for hermione

think about it, they have to fit it into a 2 and a half hour film at the most
if they were gonna do it bit by bit it'd be 6 hours

personally i wouldn't mind them splitting the book into 2 films

I hate the films anyway. Before I saw the films I had my own idea of how Harry and etc looked but after the films came out I can't imagine Harry without him looking like Daniel Radcliffe. It ruins the fun.