I think its annoying where you got to have a limited amount of size for each usergroup. Why not do it like other forums and dont do it?
Printable View
I think its annoying where you got to have a limited amount of size for each usergroup. Why not do it like other forums and dont do it?
The more immature users usually abuse it. :)
I think rewarding the members the longer and more distinguished they become is great :) if stupid people never had huge sigs and abused the feature then there would be no need for the rule in the first place.
Like the above two said,
People abused it making large sigs for no reason.
However I do believe, like JRH said, people should be rewarded with larger sigs depending on there time with habbox.
They are with the Ranks (stars)Quote:
Originally Posted by Shrlurp
I don't see the point in different sized signatures per usergroup... It makes it hard to control because moderators and super moderators would have to catch people with a signature that is a few bits bigger than someone elses AND there is no point when there are too many user groups/ranks to make much of a difference. Unless you're suggesting Platinum members have signatures that are take up a huge area. So, no real point really. Members can have one size, VIPs another and certain staff another size.
It'll just cause unnecessary hassle and problems.
I think Elkaa has set it up a while ago so that usergroups have a limit to their sig pics that is automacially checked, so it doesn't require moderators to look into it.
It's still happening with those that are hosted on image sites such as imageshack though and then embedded onto the forum. The creator of this thread even has an oversized one!Quote:
Originally Posted by sierk
All is working fine from what I can see.
Many forums do implement it which is why vBulletin developers put it into the product by default (people used to use addons to get the job done).