There needs to be a cap on how much teams can spend in Transfers..

It's just ridiculous, you get the teams like Chelsea, City, Real Madrid, Barcelona, that just inflate the market with the the ridiculous bids they make.

It's unfair that (mostly city) try and buy players for like 50+ million when they are not even worth it, other top teams should get the chance as well.

The market is inflated.. Augero 40 - 50 Mill. Ribbery 50 mill, Torres 60 - 80 mill.... ridiculous.

They moan that Clubs are in so much debt and not doing much to clear it off w/e but they need to do their bit as well, by putting in caps and making teams spend on the basis of what they can afford/earn.

The premier league/FA w/e make it so easy for ANYONE, to buy a football Club. Which shouldn't be allowed, people shouldn't be able to buy A Club if they are soley are going to gather the funds by borrowing money to pay for the bid and then putting it on the Club - Maybe if this were the case over 5 and half years ago, the Biggest Club in wouldn't be in so much debt.

Rant over/
Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Thread closed due to persistent arguments.

I think teams should be able to spend as much as they want.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by United-Clowgon

It's just ridiculous, you get the teams like Chelsea, City, Real Madrid, Barcelona, that just inflate the market with the the ridiculous bids they make.

It's unfair that (mostly city) try and buy players for like 50+ million when they are not even worth it, other top teams should get the chance as well.

The market is inflated.. Augero 40 - 50 Mill. Ribbery 50 mill, Torres 60 - 80 mill.... ridiculous.

They moan that Clubs are in so much debt and not doing much to clear it off w/e but they need to do their bit as well, by putting in caps and making teams spend on the basis of what they can afford/earn.

The premier league/FA w/e make it so easy for ANYONE, to buy a football Club. Which shouldn't be allowed, people shouldn't be able to buy A Club if they are soley are going to gather the funds by borrowing money to pay for the bid and then putting it on the Club - Maybe if this were the case over 5 and half years ago, the Biggest Club in wouldn't be in so much debt.

Rant over/

---

Biggest Club in the world*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AlexOC

I think teams should be able to spend as much as they want.

---

that isn't fair though.

Isn't that how the world works though? It works for everything, buying companies, getting a job, etc. You go for the best price you can get.
It's fair IMO, if clubs want to spend that much then let them. The poorer clubs need richer owners, better sponsers yo raise enough for more decent players

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by AlexOC

I think teams should be able to spend as much as they want.

---

Now speak taking all the bias out of that sentence.

Would you be moaning if you managed to land David Villa, Torres, Augero for big money this summer?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by United-Clowgon

that isn't fair though.

---

awwwww. :(


... this is football.
Real Madrid can afford and earn the money that they spend, they're backed by the National Bank or something. You think limiting clubs to what they earn will do good for other clubs, leagues or football in general? That's silly.

It wasnt long ago man u broke the british transfer record?

To be fair if you had billions like Man City you wouldn't be saying this.

If there's going to be a salary cap then it needs to be in all the best leagues otherwise all the great players will just go to La Liga and the Premier League will weaken.

I think there should be a cap on everything football related... Wages, transfers etc. I think it's rediculous how much they get paid :l