Printable View
Hey, + Rep if you can help me.
The code which will take you to a piece of text on that page for e.g.
'Habbo' and you click it and it scrolls to that word.
and the code to take you back to the top. like Back to top
bomb-head (forum moderator) - Moved to coding.
AND U MUST HAVE THIS ON YOUR PAGE:HTML Code:<a href="pagename.html#habbo>Habbo</A>
HTML Code:<div name="habbo">
Habbo stuff goes here ok
</DIV>
<a href="#habbo">Skip to Habbo Section</a>
<a name="habbo">This is the habbo section</a>
Exactly - the #ed link means your linking to the anchor within the page, the anchor which doesnt have a link attached and only a name, is what you link to :)Quote:
Originally Posted by dan♥♥
divs would work too..
</div> not </DIV>Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackboy
>_>
Or any element.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackboy
thanks guys got to spread
Rofl!
Who cares bout capitals
I was just thinking thatQuote:
Originally Posted by Jackboy
PERFECTIONIST!
anyone who uses xhtml?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackboy
The World Wide Web consortium do.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackboy
XHTML 1.x fails if you use ANY capitals in tags.
So, you were saying again?
when i was new to html i used capitals all the time.
They work..
Does it matter about some stupid test.
As long as a site works in the 4 popular browsers then it doesn't matter really.
Exactly, its not like anyones paying me to code it fgs.
But yet you CLAIM to be a "web developer", if you have that attitude, you're not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackboy
rofl.
Your comments are invalid ;P
You have never seen an example of my work so you can not give your opinion really.
Just because i did a little html script with capitals that WORKS, you go on about XHTML 1.x
Ok? Its not like this dudes site is going to be famous lol
Its probably some habbo fansite :)
the point is you didn't realise, which is funny. i don't care, nor does anyone else, whether that guy's site validates.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackboy
Lol ok if u say so
I don't care if it validates either, but it's not good giving a newbie (to webdev) false information. Or, in this case, half false.Quote:
Originally Posted by joshua
My comments are invalid why? Because it's obvious I know more than you in this field? I don't need to see your work; you proved you don't know anything about webdev if you think <div> and </DIV> work together. Care to know why they don't? One, you should NEVER have ANY capitals in tags, this includes, but not limited to, "onLoad", you need to have "onload".Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackboy
It WORKS, until a browser renders it wrongly, and then he probably won't even know why, because he took the advice from a "web developer", a wannabe one at that. :)
It's funny when children claim to be web developers, but can't even get one tag correct.
You probably do know more than me in this field..
I don't specialise in html do i? Im not really into it immensely, just do the basic stuff.
But anyway the point is i just quickly typed something to try and help out, and it works.
You're a web developer but just "do the basic stuff" in HTML? How does that work exactly?Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackboy
Hey, I have no problem that it was quick, but you didn't accept a correction, you shot it down with a load of crap.
Lol ok lets end this now :P
Im more of a php web developer any how lol
Why are you arguing over HTML and XHTML? :p
I thought that "onLoad" worked xS
Thanks for telling me it has to be "onload" :)
Sure. But just remember, php is useless if it can't send anything to the browser. ;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Jackboy
It works, but with the stricter doctypes it returns an error in validation. Because all tags must be all lowercase. Either works in any version of (X)HTML, but for 1.0 strict and 1.1 you need "onload".Quote:
Originally Posted by mr.geeza
Yeah spose u have a point rofl ;) :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Heinous