Iran VS Britain [Would you back the war?]

If the worst came to the worst and Iran refuse to give back our soliders, would you back war with Iran?

I would because.

1. You can't reason with backwards countrys like Iran.
2. They want Nuclear Weapons.

Hell Yeah, but only in 2014 cause then I would of completed my training and eveything and be flying the helicopters helping :8

EDIT: I do realie how serious war is and I actually want to fight for my country,

ur against toni blear tho

The UN would most likely get involved.
also iran have nuclear weapons.

first i wanna see the evidence the the iranians were in iraqi/international waters

-if i saw them i would back britain in the war till the first man dies then i'll protest

-if they dont have the evidence to prove it then i protest about the war

so basically i wanna see the evidence before i decide which side i take

No, I don't want to sound harsh here but I'd rather risk 15 lifes than risk millions if a nuclear war starts

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -internal

first i wanna see the evidence the the iranians were in iraqi/international waters

-if i saw them i would back britain in the war till the first man dies then i'll protest

-if they dont have the evidence to prove it then i protest about the war

so basically i wanna see the evidence before i decide which side i take

---

you basically don't want the war because someone is bound to die. Face the facts.

blair and bush r bum buddies so nothing like that would happen cause then america would get involved aswell where iran would 100% lose

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HabboReporter

ur against toni blear tho

---

I am but Iraq war was wrong, If worst came to worst with Iran I would back it.

I supported Blair on renewing Trident.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr.Sam

The UN would most likely get involved.
also iran have nuclear weapons.

---

Iran don't have Nuclear Weapons yet.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

I am but Iraq war was wrong, If worst came to worst with Iran I would back it.

I supported Blair on renewing Trident.

---

I understand where your coming from but if a nuclear war started the public( E.g. Us! ) would be defenceless while Tony Blair and other important people are safe in a bunker somewhere.

Nah, I rekon TB and GB would launch nukes back.

i wouldn't.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan2nd

I understand where your coming from but if a nuclear war started the public( E.g. Us! ) would be defenceless while Tony Blair and other important people are safe in a bunker somewhere.

---

We have trident to defend ourselves, it's a deterrant.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

We have trident to defend ourselves, it's a deterrant.

---

So causing the nuke to explode in the sky leaving radiation? ( I'm assuming this will happen I don't know much about nukes tbh)

i think blear should pull troops out of iraq and put them all in iran and kill there primeminister cos hes next saddam btw i told u that 1st anyway iran got nucel weapons that can blew up werld

if they put them on trial for espionage or try and hang them or harm those men and woman I think Iran would be asking for it. Then if Iran do anything else to harm another country or their people I think I would be in support of a UN-Sanctioned war.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dan2nd

So causing the nuke to explode in the sky leaving radiation? ( I'm assuming this will happen I don't know much about nukes tbh)

---

If America and it's allies didn't have nukes in the Cold War we would be under soviet control now, the communists didn't dare attack because they knew what would be on it's way if they did.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by HabboReporter

i think blear should pull troops out of iraq and put them all in iran and kill there primeminister cos hes next saddam btw i told u that 1st anyway iran got nucel weapons that can blew up werld

---

Iran don't have Nuclear Weapons at the moment.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [ALEX]

if they put them on trial for espionage or try and hang them or harm those men and woman I think Iran would be asking for it. Then if Iran do anything else to harm another country or their people I think I would be in support of a UN-Sanctioned war.

---

They are already asking for it, they are trying to be awkward and going to the UN would be pointless sadly.

As Kofi Annan said, the UN needs to do more in issues, UN don't really do anything anymore.

I lost faith in the UN yesterday when I read about how the UN done little to prevent the falklands war because it was, "too far away".

Firstly, Iran has nuclear power, therefor they have nuclear weopons.
Secondly, there isnt a reason for them not to give back the soldiers as its just a simple thing, where they got them in for security reasons, and if a war did break out, we wouldnt have the chance to duscuss whats going on, as both countrys are powerful and would destroy each other in a day or two anyway..

But the thing is, it wont happen, for somthing simply as a 'captured' crew for safety reasons which they will return. So I think its irrelivent to discuss this any further..

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by DiscoPat

Firstly, Iran has nuclear power, therefor they have nuclear weopons.
Secondly, there isnt a reason for them not to give back the soldiers as its just a simple thing, where they got them in for security reasons, and if a war did break out, we wouldnt have the chance to duscuss whats going on, as both countrys are powerful and would destroy each other in a day or two anyway..

But the thing is, it wont happen, for somthing simply as a 'captured' crew for safety reasons which they will return. So I think its irrelivent to discuss this any further..

---

They do NOT have Nuclear Weapons.

You don't have to discuss if you don't wish.

Tricky question really. Hard to answer... I would, but going to war for 15 people which would probably mean those 15 + thousands of others seems a bit pointless. BUT, there is the risk of Iran going to war with us by charging into Iraq which is unlikely, but possible.

Then there's the idea of nuclear war. As DiscoPat pointed out. They have nuclear power? They could use the nuclear plants to create a weapon? It all depends if they want to cut off power for a while or if they have enough power that removing a little wouldn't do much, so they could create a weapon with the amount they have left over.

I do not know anything about nuclear power and weapons, so that was probably aload of crap :D

Yeah they have Nuclear Power but haven't developed a weapon yet, but they will because what would a Oil rich nation like Iran need Nuclear Power for?

The fact is they don't, they are using the power issue as a cover up for creating a weapon which is a horrible thing.

I wouldn't back the war.

Just nuke them because that also stops iranian asylum seekers coming here like they would if we had a normal war :o well most because they would be dead :o israel can nuke syria then thats 2 countries who will cause us many more problems in years to come in big trouble.

Well, I think if the war was to happen Iran would destroy Britain with there nuclear stuff then UN would be like wth and then big shot usa will come to the rescue then like all muslim countries will be like Im tired of u nubs picking on are country then it'd be a huge war :).

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Royal

Well, I think if the war was to happen Iran would destroy Britain with there nuclear stuff then UN would be like wth and then big shot usa will come to the rescue then like all muslim countries will be like Im tired of u nubs picking on are country then it'd be a huge war :).

---

And nastradumus would have been right (or at least his books translators would have actually decrypted his writings right) for once.

Also, i wouldnt back a war, its pointless, Iran are allowed nucler power, there is no magic right that says iran isnt allowed nucler technolgys and we are?

North Koria was allowed to devope them and there far more dangorus than iran, the whole war problem just seems to be the US and its gas prices again.

This world is pritty much shot to hell. One day there are going to be neuclear missles flying in the air. Either your going to be melted to death by the missle or die of cancer from the radiation.

Kind of a stupid question because we would never go to war with Iran over afew soldiers simply because they can fight back. But no I wouldn't because they can do as they like aslong as it dosent affect other countries but trying to enforce democracy on them is not worth the lives.

No IMO if they keep our soldiers and refuse to stop the Nuclear power stuff then every country should just shun them and have nothing to do with them till they stop.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

I am but Iraq war was wrong, If worst came to worst with Iran I would back it.

I supported Blair on renewing Trident.



Iran don't have Nuclear Weapons yet.

---

there was a documentary on channel 4 a few months back. iran were building nukes under everyones noses until one of the workers told the un. iran had over 300 nukes. but they dont anymore i would DEFINATLY back the war if there was one because if they got away with this they could do anything

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Tiuhdur

there was a documentary on channel 4 a few months back. iran were building nukes under everyones noses until one of the workers told the un. iran had over 300 nukes. but they dont anymore i would DEFINATLY back the war if there was one because if they got away with this they could do anything

---

I REALLY DOUBT Iran had 300 Nukes, we only have around 190 Nuclear Warheads.

They don't have any now and I doubt they ever had 300.

If Iran did have 300 Nukes then Israel wouldn't be here now.

seriously they did ill try and find the documentary on google vids after the un discovered it they said in the documentary it was the biggest threat to the modern world theyve seen

I'm not sure I would because I'm of the opinion that we shouldn't go to war at all, we should be able to sort things out another way. But if it was necessary and we HAD to to protect the country etc. of course I'd back it.

If iran do start to build nukes that could reach other countries and demolish them then i think other countries with nukes ( USA Uk etc) should nuke Iran before they nuke us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mr.Sam

also iran have nuclear weapons.

---

Can everybody shut up about that ? fgs there is no flippin proof yet your so quick to judge

If Iran were the biggest threat when they supposeidly had 300 Nukes, it would of been a Cold War between us.

USA and Iran haver never gotten along well and Iran would of used Nukes against Iraqi forces in the 80's if they had any nukes.

it was before then that they had nukelear capeability before the 80s not recently. the documentry was recently not the nuclears. i think they were conviscated and destroyed cant remember much

I'm up for a UN sanctioned war. ;)

However, IMO, every other country should just freeze them out. No import/export (however enemies of the West would probably take no notice).

And @ the person that said Israel are a threat, i'm pretty sure they're on good terms with us.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-

Yeah they have Nuclear Power but haven't developed a weapon yet, but they will because what would a Oil rich nation like Iran need Nuclear Power for?

The fact is they don't, they are using the power issue as a cover up for creating a weapon which is a horrible thing.

---

In fact, they do. They showed a couple of there nuclear powered weapons some time ago on TV, when they were doing some military day thing. And you say "Cover up for creating a weapon which is a horrible thing", Eh uh, Excuse me? America, UK, Israel, Germany, France and a few more countries, have Nuclear power, so why cant Iran? And if your gonna go on about "they use it for power only" your mistaken, then have Nuclear weapons which they will use for self defence so I don't see why Iran shouldn't continue developing their Nuclear technology.:$

Adding to that, some of you think its some kind of a football match where they just bomb each other, well its not. Just because Iran made nuclear power/weapons, doesn't mean they will automatically start showing of by bombarding random countries. However I'm sure we all agree that if UK does decide to go to war, which is in my opinion nearly impossible, then Iran and UK will consider using Nuclear power, but other countries will calm it down as other countries will get affected as well.

Some of you really like hyping it lol:rolleyes:

No, I didnt back Iraq [London protests] and I wont back this.
1.We have nuclear weapons, Iran dont
2.They arent even developing them
3.Who are we to stop them, we have nuclear weapons
4.War is morally wrong.