petal: 43%Quote:
Originally Posted by HelKat
birdbath:40%
hammok:15%
howcome they dont add up to 100????:S :S
LINK:http://www.habbo.co.uk/community/news/article095.html
Printable View
petal: 43%Quote:
Originally Posted by HelKat
birdbath:40%
hammok:15%
howcome they dont add up to 100????:S :S
LINK:http://www.habbo.co.uk/community/news/article095.html
Nice find, hopefully the petal comes out :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by theman0001
ooo birdbath closely behind:O petal winning tho:D
Good find there, i bet it's petal, mutch to alot of peoples dismay!
It would seem that perhaps they aren't all whole numbersQuote:
Originally Posted by theman0001
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekalb
they're arent in the poll:S
Because As I said earlyer.. their fixed.Quote:
Originally Posted by theman0001
I was thinking of something else, I'd say the results weren't all whole numbers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordie2k6
Or it's fixed :P
That's right Ekalb, you edit :P.
I think its a false poll like last time and theyre just trying to scare us ;) Orb of doom anyone?
Yeah, something random will come out haha. Hopefully ;)
it could be just
petal: 43.1%
bb:40.45%
hammok:15.45%
or something like that
o wkddd
VOTE PETAL!
;'] the other few % might be people who haven't voteddd :p
vote for birdbath make sure petals dont come out they will decrease in value
bye to good rares actually being 'rare'
I asked a mod if the poll is rigged, waiting for a reply :s
petal: 43%
birdbath:40%
hammok:15%
thats the ideaQuote:
Originally Posted by 1alex115
Lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by Midget
Ill try get hold of a mod and ask them face to face ;P
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moozo
why would a mod know, im in the comedy queue atm so when i go in i will ask em :P
Come on, get voting!
Get that Petal back into the Catalogue!
Its rigged u dont have to vote if u want it back :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Elkaa
Aww they gonna ruin a good rare anyway :(
Sorry, But why are all the rich people saying dont vote petal, And all the poorish people saying vote petal, Your trying to change peoples minds and bias their opinions.
Vote what you think is right
Rich people dont wanna become poor because of the values of petals going down, But poor people want to be rich (Doesnt everyone?!?)
Dont let other people bias your opinions just because of how much furni they have themselves.
They don't add to 100 because not the whole hotel has voted, I think this might be the reason and o the petals' coming.
I'm voting petal, because I think it the rare that best sums up spring "/ The birdbath is close and the hammock is a bit too summery.
People who are whining about the petal patch re-release are quite pathetic really "/ It's only a rare, and the whole point of furniture is to furnish a room, not to cost alot in trade values "/
That makes no sense? I am with the decimal point theory. It can't be the remaining hotel who hasn't voted, because that is not how percentages work "/ It would be the whole hotel who has voted.Quote:
Originally Posted by SyrupyMonkey
The numbers have most likely been rounded from a decimal percentage to a whole number percentage. this is most likely why they do not add up to 100%.
I haven't voted yet, i'm voting the petal.
decimal point theory does not work even if everything was .49 the deciamls would still not ad up to 2 which is needed to make 100Quote:
Originally Posted by GommeInc
Hmmm, that is true. I think it was your post before which adds up to 99. But it would seem more like a decimal point theory than the percentage who haven't voted, because loads haven't.
Maybe Habbo Staff are rubbish at basic math?
Late April Fools! ;)
heh. i guess.
Who knows - I voted Petal
98% are above.
Petal: 43.69%
Birdbath: 40.84%
Hammock: 15.47%
Now, someone tell me that doesn't work.
At no point in the article does it say they didn't round down. Obviously, to people who are inteligent at Maths, or even pay attention in Maths it is obvious that above 0.5 it rounds up to the above, whole number. However, if they did this in a rush, or simply did not care, this would of gone unnoticed.
43.69 rounds to 44Quote:
Originally Posted by Elkaa
40.84 rounds to 41
15.47 rounds to 15
Adds to 100
However you'd expect their figures to all be below x.5 or they would have needed to round up.
It's strange how they have done it and there isn't a true explanation as to why. It seems with many of this company'sschemesplans there is always a little tiny flaw, something that doesn't add up (HEHE?)
Unless they just looked at their results and are only bothering to look at the digits before the decimal point.
As I said, from what we can see, they have rounded down, when it should of been up.