Why make one Twilight film when you can charge moviegoers to see two of them?
Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Moved to this forum from 'Discuss Anything'.
Printable View
Why make one Twilight film when you can charge moviegoers to see two of them?
Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Moved to this forum from 'Discuss Anything'.
They've done the same with harry potter it's really stupid. Money grabbing bobbas
that sucks, but then again so does twilight.
They've pulled a Harry Potter.
Apparently, movie producers like money :P
I understood splitting Harry Potter in to two movies but... there is no need beyond money-grabbing for this.
Fgs can't it just end and go away
that young guy who is eleven and hates seeing people kiss will love this
Isn't there like, 4 books though?
Have you seen how **** book number six was? With them splitting this film (HP) into two films, it will let us catch up on what we missed in book 6 (riddles past [i.e, stealing the locket/cup from that lady, which is important seeing as it is a horcux]). It hopefully will make up for the bad sixth film
It stops content from the books being missed out I guess, but whereas HP books are 600+ pages and I can see why they would do so, Twilight books are not.
Twilight is a rare instance where the screenplays are better than the books. The novels are so poorly written.
Cash cow says "Moooooooooo".