Why make one Twilight film when you can charge moviegoers to see two of them?
Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Moved to this forum from 'Discuss Anything'.
Printable View
Why make one Twilight film when you can charge moviegoers to see two of them?
Edited by Catzsy (Forum Super Moderator): Moved to this forum from 'Discuss Anything'.
They've done the same with harry potter it's really stupid. Money grabbing bobbas
that sucks, but then again so does twilight.
not really stupid considering the franchises are coming to a close. gotta get as much moolah as possible!Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle
They've pulled a Harry Potter.
Apparently, movie producers like money :P
lol, quoted for truth. it's reaaaaaaaally overrated.Quote:
Originally Posted by lorren
I understood splitting Harry Potter in to two movies but... there is no need beyond money-grabbing for this.
yeah, it annoys how badly companies are screwing us over to get our money nowadays, although i guess they always have been, but it just seems to be getting worse lately.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle
Fgs can't it just end and go away
that young guy who is eleven and hates seeing people kiss will love this
Isn't there like, 4 books though?
Have you seen how **** book number six was? With them splitting this film (HP) into two films, it will let us catch up on what we missed in book 6 (riddles past [i.e, stealing the locket/cup from that lady, which is important seeing as it is a horcux]). It hopefully will make up for the bad sixth filmQuote:
Originally Posted by HotelUser
agreed.Quote:
Originally Posted by lorren
It stops content from the books being missed out I guess, but whereas HP books are 600+ pages and I can see why they would do so, Twilight books are not.
Twilight is a rare instance where the screenplays are better than the books. The novels are so poorly written.
Cash cow says "Moooooooooo".