Titanic II

lol cant wait, these peoples is just so god damn unlucky

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f720MNvOeVc

im not gonna lie, it looks awful. Should have just left the titanic to being a classic.

Nothing to do with the original before anyone jumps the gun. It's from The Asylum, the same company who make the mockmusters like Mega Piranha, Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus, Transmorphers, Alan Quartermain and the Kingdom of Skulls, Paranormal Entity, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.

The only reason they've got away with calling the film "Titanic II" legally is because the name of the ship in the film is the Titanic II. Although you can't copyright a title, laws apply to obvious rip-offs, but The Asylum always find their way around. But they make a load because they fool everyone who is none the wiser, just like you, Nemo. Mission accomplished for The Asylum.

The first one is one of the worst movies ever IMO, this will be worse. Has a good movie ever come out of Asylum. I don't want to watch bad rip offs of bad movies and neither should anyone else.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Misawa

Nothing to do with the original before anyone jumps the gun. It's from The Asylum, the same company who make the mockmusters like Mega Piranha, Mega Shark vs. Giant Octopus, Transmorphers, Alan Quartermain and the Kingdom of Skulls, Paranormal Entity, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.

The only reason they've got away with calling the film "Titanic II" legally is because the name of the ship in the film is the Titanic II. Although you can't copyright a title, laws apply to obvious rip-offs, but The Asylum always find their way around. But they make a load because they fool everyone who is none the wiser, just like you, Nemo. Mission accomplished for The Asylum.

---

Cry :( Well i usually check out a film before i see it, and i probably wouldnt have seen it anyway so its alright, especially since it seemed serious compared with mega shark vs giant octopus i wouldnt have realised :<

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by superstar911

The first one is one of the worst movies ever IMO, this will be worse. Has a good movie ever come out of Asylum. I don't want to watch bad rip offs of bad movies and neither should anyone else.

---

To cut a long story short: no.

Mega Shark & Transmorphers was well good.

This just looks terrible.

Looks like another big budget, action(ish) film with way to much CGI. I'll probably watch it but I don't have high hopes.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by superstar911

The first one is one of the worst movies ever IMO, this will be worse. Has a good movie ever come out of Asylum. I don't want to watch bad rip offs of bad movies and neither should anyone else.

---

while i think the original titanic is one of the, if not the most overrated movie of all time, id hardly call it one of the worst movies ever. ive seen seen some pretty terrible films, i still cant believe i paid to see 10,000 b.c. i dont know which of my friends thought that was a good idea.

but lol @ people thinking this is a real sequel. i can just imagine leo dicaprio coming back up from the water like "sup?"

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Misawa

The only reason they've got away with calling the film "Titanic II" legally is because the name of the ship in the film is the Titanic II. Although you can't copyright a title, laws apply to obvious rip-offs, but The Asylum always find their way around.

---

im kinda having trouble understanding that. how could someone even have a copyright on "titanic" if it is a real historical event? that'd be like having a copyright on "world war II", i didnt think anyone could own it.

You can't have a copyright on titles, but imagine if Transformers wasn't a 30-year-old trademarked brand and the film from 2007 was a completely original work - if someone then went out and made a film called Transformers about transforming, warring robots, they'd then get sued. So, The Asylum made Transmorphers.

I see someone mentioned hack Roland Emmerich's 10,000 BC disasterpiece, well The Asylum did 10,000,000 BC. Now imagine how many people were duped by that.

And to the person who said it looked like "another big budget movie", that couldn't be further from the truth - they churn these indepedent movies out with extremely little money.

Isn't a bit like, wow why are you so ******ed to go the exact same way as before with the exact same ship except with an added 2. Also if the same thing happens where the guy finds his loved one or w/e then seriously what are the odds?

Do this:

Watch Titanic
Watch Poseidon

then you've most probably seen this.

at 1:12 why does the guy ram his head into the axe o.O I will not be watching this, it looks rubbish!

Shouldnt they have the technology these days to rescuse more people xD
Yeah - Looks crap - I thought it would be like what that woman done after the ship sunk, not a re-make

I think it premiered on Watch (or SyFy) before its direct-to-DVD launch, so the very small gathering of people that intended to buy this have now already seen it.

It looks so ******ed, imo.

SyFy. Watch is a British channel.

It looks good! :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RedStratocas

while i think the original titanic is one of the, if not the most overrated movie of all time, id hardly call it one of the worst movies ever. ive seen seen some pretty terrible films, i still cant believe i paid to see 10,000 b.c. i dont know which of my friends thought that was a good idea.

but lol @ people thinking this is a real sequel. i can just imagine leo dicaprio coming back up from the water like "sup?"



im kinda having trouble understanding that. how could someone even have a copyright on "titanic" if it is a real historical event? that'd be like having a copyright on "world war II", i didnt think anyone could own it.

---

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vD4OnHCRd_4

OH GOODY another waste of money :l

This film was awful but it did have more action (crash n sinking) then the the origanal Titanic :)

This looks terrible lmao...