Do you think if we disagree with it we can remove it? :D :D :D :D LOL
Printable View
Do you think if we disagree with it we can remove it? :D :D :D :D LOL
Yes there is a 1 month rule, if you were offended back then or whatever it'd have been reported back then :P
I was waiting for this to come up. It should really be in the update announcement!
It just stops confusion at the first instance really and that way it's a heads up as it's a factor of a change.
You could do something like you did with the accounts merge and allow people to get rep older than a month that falls into the rule breaking rep removed for a month/week or something :P
I'm somewhat disappointed that the grace period is only a month (as I have questionable reputation dating back several years) although I suppose if this wasn't the case poor Brandon would have one hundred new posts in the reputation removal thread per day.
I hadn't realized you could check historical rep until I saw this thread. The memories it brings back are--well.. horrible :P
can I have the pointless joke -rep from Jin removed as the lazy git never did it himself or is it not allowed?
Not allowed, because somewhere along the way I'm sure you deserved it. :P
David > It doesn't make sense to allow past rep to be reviewed, everyone who has had rep appeals turned down in the past will reappeal to try and see if Brandon will delete them even though old rep editors didn't. Very sensible rule :)
I know but I say we turn it around on him, wear it as a badge of pride. I have one too!
Haha yeah. I have 5 unremoved -rep from him on my banned one, all in a row going HAHAHAHAH.
But I don't think I have commented on this new addd on - its great. Well done to Richie for suggesting it and Jamesy for implementing it. Brings back memories looking at the reputation.