As title states, which is better? The cod series or the battlefield series? To me, cod will always be the fps giant.
Your opinions?
Printable View
As title states, which is better? The cod series or the battlefield series? To me, cod will always be the fps giant.
Your opinions?
COD for gameplay, But Battlefield sounds are immense, and the fact that you can actually blow the buldings. COD+BF game in one would be amazing.
Like Adam said, the destructive environments are something I sort of wish COD would have, especially when you're firing a Predator missile and it's like 'lol no there's a building here, sorry'.
Having said that, I'm not a huge fan of the way Battlefield works, I personally think the maps are far too big, I played the Beta and had problems actually finding anyone to kill/the bomb things you had to plant.
COD overall, better designs in how things work, graphics etc and just more fun imo. I know mw2 is 600p but it still looks a hell of a lot nicer then BC2, must be the engine I guess?
Plus the campaign in BF:BC2 was just dull as hell, didnt get through much.
Why is it always about graphics?
I don't care anymore, MW2 beat the FPS freak out of me.
Battlefield, always hated Call of Duty.
as soon as cod7 arrives, cod will be the pwn of the year(s)
yeah cos cod7 is basically cod+bf in one (from what it looks like)
No it looks like CoD + CoD + CoD + CoD in one.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ardemax
Battlefield Bad Company 2 > Any current CoD game but we'll see about CoD7, I'm sure Battlefield 3 will come out on top eventually but that's just how it is.
Also MW2 does NOT look better than BC2 in anyway, not sure what's wrong with your TV or whatever but there is no way MW2 looks better.
in my opinion, it does. BC2 was the biggest bore of a game ive ever played, even more boring then killzone 2 thats how boring I think it is. The only campaign mission I enjoyed was the bit about the world war 2 thing. Plus I didn't understand what was going on, at least in most games I understand what's going on. Also just in case you think im hating on BF as a series im not, I liked 1943. (BC2 and 1943 being the only ones ive played).Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil
Did you play the BC2 multiplayer?Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Selena Gomez
Call of Duty
Havnt played Battlefield so i wouldnt know different
Yeah, didn't really like it at all. The size of the map and the game mode.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fez
I only played with my friends but now we all find it boring and havn't played it since like May-ish.
Even then I still rarely went online and it wouldn't be for long.
Put battlefield's interactivity and maps along with COD's weapons layout and then you have the best of both worlds.
Hmm, cod.
Battlefield is good and all, but I just prefer the fluidity of cod. Although, I do prefer the sniping in battlefield.
I think maybe BF's bulding destruction, sounds with COD's weapon layout, maps and movement would be betterQuote:
Originally Posted by Stuto
Sniping in battlefield is perhaps the only way i can manage to play it.
IMO, people expected to much from BF:BC2, and unfortunately the developers couldnt give the expectations.
I prefer Battlefield, the maps are big, there's no where to hide. There's no such thing as a flipping kill streak, and it's more of a small team game, play with your mates kinda thing.
I like COD the best, mainly because of the awesome Killstreaks, even though there getting better in Black Ops. :)
Medal of honour pwns all. End.