Not much information at all available. It's due to be released August 26, 2011. I thought that number 4 was the last one because the film's tag line was "Death saved best til last"
http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=64394
Printable View
Not much information at all available. It's due to be released August 26, 2011. I thought that number 4 was the last one because the film's tag line was "Death saved best til last"
http://www.comingsoon.net/films.php?id=64394
Oh my god this and Saw are being milked 'til the cow squeels. The fourth was awful compared to the first three
even so, loads of people will want to see it at least once :)
Agree, they are really milking these films which ruins it in a way.Quote:
Originally Posted by Slowpoke
if you were in the film industry and had made a series of popular films though, wouldn't you want to milk as much money out of the name as you could?Quote:
Originally Posted by [Jay]
Yep offcurse its bussines :P I just feel that it would of been better if they had stoped at 3.Quote:
Originally Posted by pasta
If not only for the gruesome deaths, which are always disturbingly satisfying to watch in Final Destination filmsQuote:
Originally Posted by [Jay]
InnitQuote:
Originally Posted by JACKTARD
I thought that the 4th one was the last one, but i'll probably not go to see it at the cinema and just got in on DVD.Quote:
Originally Posted by JACKTARD
can't wait to see it
Jesus christ, couldn't they just quit while they were ahead.
http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/5323/amamama.gif
Nobody should go to watch Final Destination for the fine acting and the great script because there's none of that in any four of the films. Final Destination is about the graphical content of the deaths and that is all it should be about. Anybody got any idea what deaths might be added this time round? Final Destination four was pure comedy with the OTT deaths so surely it'll only get worse?
a scene which includes lazer eye surgeryQuote:
Originally Posted by Describe
I've only ever watched the 3rd and 2nd one but i loved both of them but i didnt fancy the 4th one it didnt look as appealing as the others nor this one
I found this on youtube dunno if it is the actual trailer but :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5hqSFWjehg
read that on the website that was posted.Quote:
Originally Posted by Special
that's a fan video, it's clips from different movies and the lion at the start was from the lion king.Quote:
Originally Posted by UnknownQuantity
Yeah i thought so 8-)
That trailer is awesome for a fan-made
i swear i posted this like a month ago
The film hasn't gone into production yet. The "opening diaster scene" is set on a suspension bridge. Tony Todd told me the other day that he is set to star, which is something.
tbh the olny thing tht look legit in tht trailer is the suspension bridge, but they wont have started filimg yet right?
and what use would a month old thread be?Quote:
Originally Posted by smiffy70
Quote:
Originally Posted by Misawa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Describe
:S :S :S ?????Quote:
Originally Posted by smiffy70
Anyway, I've always liked the Final Destination films up until the fourth which was complete horse ****. It wasn't just the horrible acting and original death scenething, but the CGI was terrible too. I'm hoping this will be the last and it will go out on a positive note (same with Saw 7).
I'm sure i remember reading somewhere, and if i'm wrong misawa will correct me on this, but apparently the producer said that 4 was meant to be the last but he just couldn't resist doing another. *Waits for misawa to correct me*
Couldn't resist doing another or just thought he could milk it one step further? :PQuote:
Originally Posted by djclune
That is ight.Quote:
Originally Posted by djclune
Saw have confirmed after the poor 6th film number the 7th is in fact the lastQuote:
Originally Posted by Slowpoke
and there is roumers that it will be called "The 5inal Destination"
I hope they realize that says Sinal or 5-in-all... lol :PQuote:
Originally Posted by -paul.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Techno
well we still get what it means lol, suppose they could be a bit more imaginative with it though
Actually, IMO and that of many others, saw 6 has been the best one since the first two. As I said, that's just my opinion but it was hardly poor.Quote:
Originally Posted by -paul.
I don't get why they don't just call it Final Destination 5...
What he means by "poor" is the box office performance. It didn't do so well so they've decided to end it before it starts really bombing.
Money is quite an incentive in the film-making industry :p. As long as they make profits they'll keep making them I guess.
Money is the only reason sequels are green lit, and no other franchise since the slashers of the '80s is evident of this than Saw, but that is finally coming to a close next month.
Can't wait! Still have to watch teh first one! :)