I'm sure last month we were told that it was going to return, but it hasn't?
Just wondering if it is, because I really liked it and think it was a good idea :)
Printable View
I'm sure last month we were told that it was going to return, but it hasn't?
Just wondering if it is, because I really liked it and think it was a good idea :)
Top poster has now been removed as posting is part of the MOTM criteria anyway. The posting is about the quality of the posts, not the quantity. The script has also messed up now anyway so we wouldn't be able to do it at the moment even if we wanted to :P
"top poster" comps just lead to really really pointless posting and the same old person clogging up my new post feed with old threads and nothing of any worth.
I love that analogy Richie :P I don't really know why it got set up in the first place personally, a requirement of member of the month has always been to "post around the forum a lot" so it always seemed a bit silly to me :P
Plus robbie spamming the forum madef I'd say about 10 members a week leave the forum
Not going to bother arguing about removing them, as clearly these are never going to be stopped.
However, the history argument is the lamest argument in the world. You don't see businesses not moving "because they have been in the same building for 100 years". You don't see nus still having the death penalty. Historic things do not have to sgtay forever.
On the other hand, I have 10k odd posts, it doesn't bother me if nusers wish to post in these threads, and it doesn't affect me :)
I'm going to close this thread prematurely to avoid the argument that's inevitably coming, the issue has been resolved and people seem to agree - I'm not willing to see yet another boring argument about threads which aren't going to change.