...Emdadur Choudhury, 26, of Spitalfields, east London, was fined £50 for offences under the Public Order Act.
Just FIFTY POUNDS?! What a disrespectful punishment to past and present troops.
What do you think? Is this an appropriate penalisation? I think definitely not.
BBC Article
Petition
They should have been charged a lot more than fifty pounds, in my opinion.
How low this country and its inhabitants have sunk, taking one another to court over one anothers opinions.
the £50 fine is just a public order offense, i don't see how they can fine him for what they meant or what they said - but i should imagine that they are actually fining him for the physical burning of the poppies as it is a hazard, though its not entirely clear in the article whether its what he meant by it or the action itself.
Why should they fine him more than £50?
It's disrespectful towards the very soldiers who fought for the safety of the country he's living in. I'm shocked that I'm pointing something out that's so rudimentary.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Don
I know why he shouldn't do it, but what are they going to do with the money?Quote:
Originally Posted by HotelUser
I think it is frowned upon him doing this, and whatever crime it falls under, he should be punished for. If the crime fell into the £50 bracket, he should pay £50.
Obviously I don't agree with what the man did dave, but theres no special circumstances that should be given to make him pay more.
As far as I remember, he didn't cause a scene in the middle of the memorial activities. If he was being disruptive and started causing public unrest he would of got more, assuming he literally goes into the midst of the event and starts kicking people, but he didn't. £50 is probably for burning an object in the middle of a street.
That said, the man is a bit stupid burning a poppy which is a symbol of the freedom from oppression in the UK - if the war was lost he would of been shot dead, or not allowed here in the first place :P If he hates the war so much, make it worth while and burn symbols relating to Tony Blair - at least he'd get a better following.
So if a neighbour is disrespectful you over a hedge dispute for example, you think that should go through the courts and end in fines?Quote:
Originally Posted by HotelUser
I thought you were all for the british way of life Dan, surely burning a symbol of british history is a bad thing?
The British way of life includes liberty which is founded on old English law, as opposed to continental style law such as this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Niall!
You can if you want to.. that's what small claims court is for.Quote:
Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:-
Whilst I agree this is a horrible thing which has happened, I believe in fair justice, and frankly if they had burned something else nobody would have complained therefore it is a matter of perspective and no real crime has been committed. If you assault a person or discriminate people then it's different, but burning a poppy, just move on, sure voice that it's a bad thing but meh, this is dumb.
It probably costed the british tax payer more to actually take them to court.
I have a better idea.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Don
Kick the ****** out the country.
--
Gonna have to say the joke, from Sickipedia:
BBC News: Ticket touts to be fine £20,000 at Olympics.
So, if you get caught selling Olympic tickets, throw them on the floor and burn them. Then claim they are poppies.
I'm not talking about the hedge, i'm talking about the fact that abuse/creating offence is now a criminal matter, which is wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chippiewall
I just don't understand why people like that are in the country, and we let them away with stuff that is clearly trying to incite hatred. I don't get why they just don't go live somewhere else if they hate the way things are over here so much.