Printable View
is there a way to extend the plugin so it includes the mods name?
atm it relies on the mod to say for example Sorted - Jordan, would be more useful to automatically include that so you can see who dealt with the report, or force mods to always include their name on it or be told off
Depends how they do it, if its them replying to a thread its a long shot. But if they are replying to a plugin I cant see it being super hard. when someone with admin and a brain comes on post the name of the plugin and we'll have a look
I think this would be useful yeah, maybe not compulsory when they are just marked as sorted but when the comment is something else it would be nice to know.
I'd prefer that as well as i've just had a report for example which I believe is in the wrong forum and suggested they move it and it was simply marked as 'sorted' when it had not been moved, so obviously they disagree with my report so instead of saying sorted should include why they believe otherwise or their name so i can ask them via vm or something.Quote:
Originally Posted by runeaddict99
"Advanced Report System" - I had plans to remove it due to bugs in the back end but we changed our mind last minute. It doesn't have any settings to add the moderator's name to it but have fun.
I would of thought the other two smods would of left comments if they disagree and their name as I know I do. Matt said there isnt a thing to add the name automatically so I guess we'll have to make sure we add our name on the end of the report.
should remind mods or something in handbook and make sure they all know.
Only super moderators deal with reported posts. Anyway, a name should be left when something has been dealt with. If they agree with the report then they can simply put "Sorted, thanks ~ Name". If they disagree with the report then they can give a reason why they disagree and sign it off with their name.Quote:
Originally Posted by scottish
DECADE ON HABBO ;D 03-01-2013 08:45 PM Wrong Forum should be in achievments/thanks or spam. sorted Closed
can you see who dealt with that?
No because a bug prevents us from seeing it which is very annoying. We were going to remove the system but decided against it. I'll find the thread and have a look anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by scottish
So you don't know who deals with each report? :S seems like a good system to keep in place
I think the person who did this got confused because two members reported the thread. One for filter avoidance and you because of the wrong forum. I edited the thread first (without knowing it had been reported) for filter avoidance, so when the next smod looked only looked at one of the report reasons and saw filter avoidance and ticked it off as I had done that.Quote:
Originally Posted by scottish
ill sort it out for you now
Reports get posted to a forum too so I can see in there! I think the reason the report says sorted is because someone else also reported the post for filter avoidance which was dealt with. Your report reason was to have it moved to the congrats forum.Quote:
Originally Posted by scottish
We do know who does each report because we have a forum where the reported threads get sent to where we edit the titles with who dealt with it and a quick explanation of what we did like (sorted - edit and pm). But because members wanted a comments box with the reported threads we have to go on MODCP and add comments in that way and thats where the bug is.Quote:
Originally Posted by scottish
Not that I'm particularly bothered as I irregularly report posts but the last 2 I have had have just been "done"Quote:
Originally Posted by Jordan
I'd also like to suggest that if a moderator does disagree with the report to at least provide some explanation rather than 'n/a' and it saying closed, because that doesn't really help.
If the person who has reported it has reported it correctly, then posting 'done' or 'sorted - jordan' isn't a problem. Providing an explanation if you disagree should be done and left with the persons name.Quote:
Originally Posted by Alex3213
It's all be made clear in the staff forums now and hopefully it will be better from now on.
This is what I was about to say. On the first page of my reports, four of them are just n/a and many of them are just 'done' without a name. Would be useful to see their name, but would probably be easier if each mod just tries to add their name to the end of each comment :).Quote:
Originally Posted by Kardan
I hate the 'n/a' ones, they should give a reason...
It's not hard to work out who is doing which report though, for the most part I know who's done my reports!
I understand why though, if a moderator always signed off on doing them then it could actually provoke bullying, it could look like they weren't doing the report because of who it was, or deliberately belitting the reporter. Like when people post 'x is a rubbish moderator'... well they don't know that if the moderator hasn't signed off (one ones that haven't been edited, ones that are you can easily check because of the modwarn tags!)
stop wasting your time caring about such insignificant things