goodbye undertaker

Printable View

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

19-01-2015, 11:15 PM
scottish

goodbye undertaker

no longer rv manager
19-01-2015, 11:20 PM
Kyle

He's only doin it so he can return and have the record for most stints as manager! Thank you for your time and continued dedication throughout the years. I feel like rv as a staff team has been defunct for a while though.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
19-01-2015, 11:20 PM
despect

Thanks for your time!

I wonder if this is the end of RVs?
19-01-2015, 11:20 PM
Reality

Thank you for your time!
19-01-2015, 11:22 PM
FlyingJesus

Posts saying he might leave soon, 12 hours later FIRED
19-01-2015, 11:24 PM
lawrawrrr

I'm sure you'll all have tons of questions so make sure you come to the GM takeover tomorrow evening and I'll answer everything I can :)

Thanks for your work though Dan.
19-01-2015, 11:26 PM
scottish

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrawrrr

I'm sure you'll all have tons of questions so make sure you come to the GM takeover tomorrow evening and I'll answer everything I can :)

Thanks for your work though Dan.

you can't discuss dismissals though?!

or do you mean about the future of RV.
19-01-2015, 11:27 PM
xxMATTGxx

Meet you in that bar for a couple of drinks Dan
19-01-2015, 11:28 PM
Inseriousity.

stop rigging the samovers fgs!

thanks for your work :D
19-01-2015, 11:28 PM
lawrawrrr

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottish

you can't discuss dismissals though?!

or do you mean about the future of RV.

Obviously about the future of RV, that's why I said I'd answer whatI can.
19-01-2015, 11:46 PM
j0rd

wait what

thanks dan!
19-01-2015, 11:48 PM
Kellie

Thanks for your time
19-01-2015, 11:49 PM
Bloop

APPALLING thanks for yr time hopefully you will return soon :(((
19-01-2015, 11:56 PM
GoldenMerc

Lol bye dan
20-01-2015, 12:06 AM
AgnesIO

http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=819596

Rather sudden change. Would be interested to know what happened.

I suspect this is the end of RV as it currently stands.
20-01-2015, 12:08 AM
Nick

Redundancy, he got a 2000 credit pay out.

Thanks for your time Dan!
20-01-2015, 12:28 AM
FlyingJesus

Fired for not changing his sig after the 16th
20-01-2015, 02:25 AM
Brad

Thanks Dan for your time.
20-01-2015, 04:23 AM
Drew

Thanks for your time :)
20-01-2015, 07:40 AM
IzzyUhh

Awkward
Thanks for your time x
20-01-2015, 08:03 AM
Cow

Bye Dan x
20-01-2015, 08:15 AM
Empired

Thanks for everything you've done! Rare values has never been of much interest to me but it looks like you were definitely working hard. Not sure there was much to be done about its decline in popularity though :(
20-01-2015, 09:04 AM
AgnesIO

Why do people keep removing Dan's post?

Are you really that embarrassed about the reason?
20-01-2015, 09:04 AM
-:Undertaker:-

My comment has now been removed for the third time as well as a comment by MyChemicalRomance.

Thanks for the kind comments guys x :)
20-01-2015, 09:25 AM
lawrawrrr

goodbye undertaker

Quote:

Originally Posted by MyChemicalRomance

Why do people keep removing Dan's post?

Are you really that embarrassed about the reason?

Because discussing dismissals is against the rules (the former manager or AGMs doing it).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
20-01-2015, 09:32 AM
Kyle

Deleted posts still appear on tapatalk :) the reach of your censorship doesn't extend far enough! I didn't realise he was dismissed I thought he had just stepped down. Good luck to habbox if they continue with rare values as a staffed department, they'll not find anybody as dedicated to the cause.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
20-01-2015, 09:33 AM
lemons

goodbye miss u
20-01-2015, 09:57 AM
Chippiewill

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrawrrr

Because discussing dismissals is against the rules (the former manager or AGMs doing it).

I thought the policy was management wouldn't discuss it unless the person dismissed does.
20-01-2015, 10:01 AM
AgnesIO

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrawrrr

Because discussing dismissals is against the rules (the former manager or AGMs doing it).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

A5. Do not post private details or information ~ We do not allow you to post private information about yourself due to security concerns. Disclosing any information about another forum user without their consent is also not allowed. This includes:

- Dismissals

Can I just clarify what the 'security concerns' are here? :P Just to be sure who is in danger..

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chippiewill

I thought the policy was management wouldn't discuss it unless the person dismissed does.

TO my understanding that is the policy... when it suits.
20-01-2015, 10:05 AM
lawrawrrr

All I know is that in the past, former managers have been told off and posts removed - I'm not just going around deleting posts I don't like - in fact all of the AGMs have been online this morning talking about it and all moving posts!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
20-01-2015, 10:06 AM
Shar

How ridiculous. Thanks for your time Dan!
20-01-2015, 10:11 AM
AgnesIO

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrawrrr

All I know is that in the past, former managers have been told off and posts removed - I'm not just going around deleting posts I don't like - in fact all of the AGMs have been online this morning talking about it and all moving posts!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

*Former* managers. Yeah, I'm sure they care a lot.

Generally speaking, when you sack someone they don't really care what you think about them afterwards.

I think transparency is very important, and by the looks of it, most agree.
20-01-2015, 10:33 AM
scottish

http://lexet.net/undertaker.html

but yes, it's always been GM's etc won't discuss it unless the person in question initiates discussion.
20-01-2015, 11:20 AM
lawrawrrr

goodbye undertaker

So according to you guys I'm now allowed to discuss everything? :p
@Wispur;

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
20-01-2015, 11:23 AM
AgnesIO

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrawrrr

So according to you guys I'm now allowed to discuss everything? :p
@Wispur;

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Please do, nice to hear both sides, after all.
20-01-2015, 11:24 AM
lawrawrrr

Quote:

Originally Posted by MyChemicalRomance

Please do, nice to hear both sides, after all.

Gonna wait for Chris to make a decision on that :p

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
20-01-2015, 11:28 AM
scottish

Quote:

Originally Posted by lawrawrrr

So according to you guys I'm now allowed to discuss everything? :p
@Wispur;

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

It's always been like that.

As long as the member in question who got fired posts stating it's allowed/they initiate it then others typically respond.

I remember countless times people got fired and @xxMATTGxx; would be asked, and he'd say it's up to the other person to discuss if they wish to, it's never not been allowed for the fired member to state why afaik..
20-01-2015, 12:56 PM
Inseriousity.

that was my understanding of the situation too scott.
20-01-2015, 01:09 PM
Sian

What is the point of rules when not even a agm knows what to do with it?

And also boo. I thought Dan was doing good. And showing more of the work he did for his department then most other managers, and I don't even care about rv
20-01-2015, 01:23 PM
Lewis

That's a shame. I don't really think it's a justified reason, but I'm only seeing one side of things so I can't really say one way or another obviously.

Thanks for your time! :)

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page