http://uk.news.yahoo.com/05032007/14...arry-iraq.html
Discuss.
Printable View
If he wasn't allowed to go, there would be uproar.
If he dies there will be uproar.
I say send him but at the same time we can't because he is going to put those around him in danger :l
I have a easy way to get out of it. Pull out entirely from Iraq, then they'd be no reason to take him or anyone else there to be risk being injured and killed.
It'd solve most the matters, but create more.
We bombed Iraq, running out would begin a civil war, that's if there isn't already.
hes no diffent from anyone else there.
shouldnt be treated any diffrently.
Not really, just because Harry is a prince, doesn't make him
more important than all the other soldiers who are giving
their life for the country. Yes, he may be more important when he isnt
serving in Iraq, but when they are all fighting all of them mean the same
amount to the country. They are all serving in iraq, risking their lives.
Therefore they are all important. Also, I reckon if harry gets
killed/kidnapped,there will be MAJOR arguments and uproar about it all.
I reckon he should go out and just try to protect himself.
As if our government and the US would do that?
Personally, I hope something happens to Harry so he doesn't go to Iraq, something bad is bound to happen.
Edit to replies at above.
I think he should be treated diffrently, because if something does happen to him, god knows what will happen next, the war on terroism is already in a bad enough state, with a senior member of our royal family being killed, it'll make things worse.
good. hes no bloody diffrent from the other people risking there lives out there /;