Match of the day.

[Andys]

Why do they have to show the games from the "big 4" near the start?
Even when they're absolutley ****e games, then they show the small teams last - even if it's a cracker of a game. :rolleyes:

It really pisses me off :/

[Tristan]

...
Liverpool were kinda near the end. Like, the middle-latter part of the show.

[Minstrels]

Think of City, last week City didn't even play. It was all Chelsea for 15 minutes.

[Geraint]

Errrr, because more people want to see it?

West Ham were on first, anyway. Just because Sunderland weren't on first.

[Andys]

Errrr, because more people want to see it?

West Ham were on first, anyway. Just because Sunderland weren't on first.

How predictable.
How wern't Liverpool on last? They were absolute balls.

[Geraint]

How predictable.
How wern't Liverpool on last? They were absolute balls.

They had 39 shots and a disallowed goal. It's a good result for Stoke, maybe that's why.

[Andys]

It's a good result for Stoke, maybe that's why.

Still a boring match though :rolleyes:

[Geraint]

Still a boring match though :rolleyes:

The order means nothing. Some games that are second have 5 minutes air time and the 5th game could have 10.

[Andys]

It's usuauly the games on first have ages then the games on last don't have very long?

[Geraint]

It's usuauly the games on first have ages then the games on last don't have very long?

Not always.