Don't move this to complaints because I created it to gain an insight into how others feel about the moderation within the spam forum.
Personally, I think it's non-existent or very poor. This week there have been numerous arguments which I know General Management and I would hope the Moderation Department are fully aware of. However, negative sanctions haven't been handed out like they normally would be purely due to the excessive amounts of rule breaking. That's a very lazy mentality to have but throughout this week this lazy attitude has been evident.
I'm not creating this at a dig in anyone in particular it's just I think that the moderation in the spam forum needs to be looked at. I imagine it has always been one of the forums where the most amount of rule breaking occurs so surely the super moderators should help out the moderators if there is an excessive amount of rule breaking.
OK, admittedly threads have been closed and I assume infractions have been given out. The amount of time it has taken for threads to be closed has been bordering on ridiculous. As soon as there is an argument the thread should be closed... there is a thread which is like 17 pages with a lot of arguing in which has calmed now but was never closed yet I know for a fact moderators have viewed the thread.
Creating threads doesn't do anything but makes me think it was done in a time-cutting exercise which is a poor decision to make. Getting to the root of the problem is the only way to rid it not just try and paper the cracks which is the option that has been taken.
I wouldn't even know who a super moderator is and it never used to be like that. The only two I can think of off the top of my head are Jess and Yoshimitsui where previously I would be able to recite at least 4 or so.





Reply With Quote







