http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7990927.stm
Okay where do I get started on this news article, I'm afraid this piece of news is worth a bit of ranting.Originally Posted by BBC News
He's bought an 18 game (Grand Theft Auto IV) and then gave it to his 12 year old son, which you don't admit to the news, there's the first problem. He then complains that the ecstasy found in the pre-owned game is awful as he gave it to his 12 year old son, in the eyes of the law he shouldn't of done that in the first place. He has the cheek to report gamestation to the media for this yet the hypocrite is giving it to a 12 year old son which obviously doesn't look good, most 12 year old boys wouldn't eat a random white tablet anyway, it's common sense so there's not much need to fuss over him.
He also bought the pre-owned game for £25, why? You can buy it brand new for £20 on Amazon, buying it brand new and saving a fiver could of stopped the whole ecstasy situation...
And it also amazes me that Gamestation didn't even check the game, must be pretty obvious to see something like that in the case. Really makes you wonder what you're buying when you're buying pre-owned if they haven't even spotted ecstasy in it.





Reply With Quote







