Kaka to Madrid

[champions]

Done deal says SSN

56m

[Immenseman]

interesting if only my tv worked, lol

[Andys]

haha if its true then man city = owned

[-Heart]

Lololololololol owned City.

[Immenseman]

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,195...360176,00.html

still seems to be a lot of confusion

i dont think city are owned or will be gutted, they tried to sign him, it didn't work. i doubt they were going to go for him again anyway. if anything, it looks like chelsea were going to try their luck

[sock]

rather have barry and ireland

no.. not really.. i'm not gutted or owned though.. i'd rather spend the 100M or whatever on 6 15M signings.

edit: I don't think he's signed, these are rumours reported by a radio station.. no official has spoken to these.

[Immenseman]

yeah sky sports always does this, making rumours sound official much like minstrels

[sock]

yeh they also said kaka sign for city..

[Excellent2]

Well atleast they won't be chasing Ronaldo now. Perhaps Milan will?

[Wolverhampton]

Kaka won't go their, these rumours have been about for years.

If anything, he'll go to Chelsea, as they have his old manager and they'd offer silly amounts such as £60M+

TBH what's stopping City offering the £86M again? If they offer that and Madrid offer the £56, Milan will obviously take Manchester Cities offer, even if the player liked it or not, as if the rumours are true he must be considering leaving Milan? so Milan could just say, ok, your considering Madrids offer, we have recieved a £86M offer from Manchester City, we want you to go their as they have offered £30M more?

Who knows.