Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,601
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default I'm A Celebrity's D'Acampo and Manning face rat charges

    I'm A Celebrity... Get Me Out Of Here! winner Gino D'Acampo and Stuart Manning face charges of animal cruelty after cooking and eating a rat in the show.

    The RSPCA in New South Wales, Australia, said it was "not acceptable" that a rat had been killed by the pair as part of a performance.

    Police confirmed they had issued court attendance notices for 3 February 2010.

    The Italian chef and actor ate the rat after they were "exiled" and reduced to rations of rice and beans on the show.

    D'Acampo, 33, told the show's video diary room, the Bush Telegraph: "I saw one of these rats running around. I got a knife, I got its throat, I picked it up."

    The "exiled" group, including 30-year-old Manning, ate the rat as part of a meal.

    Ch Insp David Oshannessy, from the RSPCA in New South Wales, told BBC Radio 5 live there was a "code of practice" which dictated how animals could be used in theatrical productions and films.

    "The killing of a rat for a performance is not acceptable. The concern is this was done purely for the cameras," he said.

    'Ongoing'

    The charity sends staff whenever animals are used for filmed or live performances, he said, and so had been in contact with the programme's producers before the rat was killed.

    "Production staff have to summit a notification form to the RSPCA or Animal Welfare League - both are charged with responsibilities under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

    "But we received no pre-notice or advice this segment was going to occur, it happened on a day no animals were featuring in production, so we didn't have an officer there," he said.

    Inquiries were "very much ongoing" and the RSPCA was not "ruling out" further charges against the production company ITV, he added.

    A spokesman added: "Police from Murwillumbah yesterday issued field court attendance notices to two men aged 30 and 33 for the offence of animal cruelty.

    "They are due to attend court at Murwillumbah local court on 3 February 2010."

    ITV was unavailable for comment.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/8397691.stm


    Does anyone else think this is a bit stupid? I never knew it was so bad to kill a rat over there. I'm sure they only did it for food as well. Good luck to them both!
    Last edited by xxMATTGxx; 06-12-2009 at 09:39 AM.


    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    7,166
    Tokens
    1,369

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    How pathetic. They really need to get a grip if that is their argument. If you're stuck in the jungle, you're hardly gonna think twice about killing something.

    That's lowered what I thought of the RSPCA now.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Cardboard Box、
    Posts
    298
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    Even though i care alot about animals i don't think they have to be that tight. The jungle was miles away from where they was anyway.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Venus
    Posts
    1,936
    Tokens
    127
    Habbo
    Molly.22

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Thats just pathetic, if it was that serious they would have been pulled out of the show.
    Hi

    Wow, it's been a while.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Burnley
    Posts
    6,129
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I like how the RSPCA have said it was done purely for the cameras. They talk absolute ****. They need to wake up, look around and realise animals are used for food, sad *******s who thought to make these charges, only thinking about money.
    (h)(h)(h)

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    280
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    how petty, seriously people get let off for things like burglary and stuff and then there taking them to court for a stupid rat:S gets on my nerves.
    i love sunflowers hen.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    ═╬═
    Posts
    7,060
    Tokens
    182

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Stupid tree hugging hippies
    Conductor of the Runaway Train of Militant Homosexuality

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Middlesbrough, England
    Posts
    9,336
    Tokens
    10,837

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Just those two? Is it for the killing or the eating? Cos there were the rest of the exile camp who ate the rat too but if it was just for the killing/cooking, it'd make sense.

    Well, not sense because it's a completely stupid case. They were hungry and basic human survival nature is to eat whatever is available!

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Wales
    Posts
    8,753
    Tokens
    3,746

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I think it's a bit OTT.
    "There are only two important days in your life: the day you are born, and the day you find out why."
    Mark Twain


  10. #10
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    12,405
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Killing an animal quickly is bad but throwing thousands of creatures into tanks of water with people jumping about and eating them is fine? :S

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •