Apple vs Google - Getting Personal.

[marriott0.01]

Nothing sells papers (or ads) like turning a little corporate competition into something personal. Case in point, a New York Times piece from the weekend titled "Apple's Spat With Google Is Getting Personal," that opened with this rather ominous, one-sentence paragraph:
"It looked like the beginning of a beautiful friendship."
Cue the orchestra. The lengthy piece chronicling the relationship between the Silicon Valley titans was formed by two dozen interviews with industry watchers, investors, and current and former employees. It covers a timeline spread that began with Google and Apple working in harmony to prevent Microsoft's domination of online services and mobile devices, and ends with Apple's patent lawsuit against HTC that reeks of a proxy battle against Android and Google. According to the NYT then, the heart of the dispute is betrayal, or Jobs' belief that Schmidt (a former Apple board member) "picked his pocket" by developing cellphones that "physically, technologically and spiritually resembled the iPhone." Here's how one especially feisty encounter is described:
"At one particularly heated meeting in 2008 on Google's campus, Mr. Jobs angrily told Google executives that if they deployed a version of multitouch - the popular iPhone feature that allows users to control their devices with flicks of their fingers - he would sue. Two people briefed on the meeting described it as "fierce" and "heated.""
And that's just the beginning. Read the rest after the break.

The NYT also corroborated an earlier report from Wired detailing the verbal lashing Jobs' gave Google during an internal Apple town hall meeting. You remember, the tirade that had Jobs calling Google's 'Don't be evil' slogan "********." Yeah, that one.

Adding to the battling egos is, Tim Bray, the architect behind XML, who wrote a blog post yesterday announcing his new role as evangelist to software developers for Google's Android platform. He had this to say about competing with Apple:
"The iPhone vision of the mobile Internet's future omits controversy, sex, and freedom, but includes strict limits on who can know what and who can say what. It's a sterile Disney-fied walled garden surrounded by sharp-toothed lawyers. The people who create the apps serve at the landlord's pleasure and fear his anger. I hate it."
He then adds,
"Apple apparently thinks you can have the benefits of the Internet while at the same time controlling what programs can be run and what parts of the stack can be accessed and what developers can say to each other. I think they're wrong and see this job as a chance to help prove it."
The Jobs v. Schmidt meme was then picked up by analysts on CNBC yesterday with Jim Goldman being told by many sources that, "Steve Jobs simply hates Eric Schmidt right now." An anger undoubtedly intensified by Android's dramatic rise in maretshare in recent months. See the frenzied hysterics discussed in the video below.

http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/...nbcplayershare

http://www.engadget.com/2010/03/16/a...hates-eric-sc/

Who's side are you on Google or Apple?

[Firehorse]

I would be more sympathetic to apple but they always have their heads up their arses by trying to keep absolutely everything under their control and limit what you can do with their products too much.

[Markeh]

Google. they seem to believe in making things more.... open than Apple, tbh.

[AgnesIO]

Google.

Jobs is a ruddy fool.

[The Professor]

Google is evil and Apple are up themselves, i don't like either of them tbh. I prefer Google as a company more though because it is actually doing things for the greater good (standing up to china, mapping the UK with streetview, making android open etc) whereas you'd be lucky to get Apple to co-operate with an error message.

[Sunny.]

Google over apple.

Apples way to up their own arse

[marriott0.01]

Google is evil and Apple are up themselves, i don't like either of them tbh. I prefer Google as a company more though because it is actually doing things for the greater good (standing up to china, mapping the UK with streetview, making android open etc) whereas you'd be lucky to get Apple to co-operate with an error message.

But don't you have Google to thank for some of the Greatest Innovation of the 20th and 21st Century? They were the people to first bring the personal computer to the masses with the Apple Lisa and that was also the first computer to actually be COLOUR! God forbid could i use a computer these days if it was in black and white. They also brought multi-touch and a lot of other innovations, so shouldn't a company who have invested billions upon billions on research and development be allowed to protect people riding on their patents to get a quick buck?

I don't think any less of Google, I like Google don't get me wrong, but Apple are right on this case, Google shouldn't make money from a product that is using the innovation Apple created, much the same Apple shouldn't get away with using the technology Nokia had created. This is why I believe that as far as this case is concerned Apple is right and Google should just be quiet and either come to an agreement with Apple.

[Tomm]

Google. I benefit nothing from the existence of Apple whereas I gain significantly from the existence of Google.

[HotelUser]

Google.

Jobs is a ruddy fool.

Yeah. Someone rated one of the best CEOs in the world is a ruddy fool.

I deem this poll biased because there's a lot of "Microsoft fanboys" here

[marriott0.01]

Yeah. Someone rated one of the best CEOs in the world is a ruddy fool.

I deem this poll biased because there's a lot of "Microsoft fanboys" here

lols, and people who say Apple hasn't brought us anything, who owns an iPod here?