Was it only a few days ago that I opened a thread pointing out that decisions were being rushed, and that threads were being closed when staff and decisions are put under question. I was very quickly told this was not true by several members of staff, so why is it that THIS thread has been closed? Regardless of whether the choice would have been changed there was no real basis to close that thread and is essential to prevent similar situations occurring again.
b) Management is not allowed to be criticized by users because "it's Jin's job", forum management specifically will close any thread putting members of their department under review.
The only times I can remember closing threads were when public feedback threads turned personal against a new trialist, which wasn't fair on him. Theres a complaints for for that sort of issue or PMing members of gen / forum management too.Admittedly it was not Jamesy's decision but THIS is a massive piss-take and I'm sure at some point he would have known the decision before it was announced and raised concerns. In fact EVERY member of Habbox Staff should have been alert not to make stupid decisions.d) Hiring of staff is being rushed, checks are not being made to ensure that the moderator applying is knowledgeable / fits all criterion.
I wouldn't say rushed either. Admittedly mistakes were made but I trusted gut instinct on that one and I stand by it, next time around I will be making sure it is fairer though. Again I apologise for this.
And despite the prior statement, he surely could have made some kind of argument against this:
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=669839
Care to explain?
NB - I would like to point out that I am not (Nor is this thread) targeting the new Asst. Manager, but merely the decision to close the thread and the rushed, unfair decision. Therefore this thread is not against any rules that can be interpreted in any reasonable or fair way and cannot therefore be closed.












