Would you capture or kill Gadhafi?

[Showder]

Hello there , Good AM/PM!

Today's debate I have considered to create is all about the current crisis in Libya , where Gadhafi has not been found. Since 6 months Gadhafi , the dictator of the country has fled into hiding , as majority of rebels are out to capture him. As you have seen in newspapers or TV , everyone is on the lookout for this infamous guy right now.

Your debate is .. if you were placed in a position of the rebels , would you either capture or to your choice , kill Gadhafi for your nation?

What if .... Gadhafi wasn't even found? Would you still try finding or hunting him? You could add some points to your statement , clear stating why Ghadafi should be captured or killed , in your decision.
My suggestion is , do not go out of this topic please as it may result in arguments!
All the best in your claims and good luck!

[GommeInc]

Capture. If they want democracy then they should do the honourable thing and just capture him and put him on trial. He's not a dangerous man as a single object, and to kill him straight away would be an anti-climax and barbaric for a nation that wants to modernise and advance socially.

If he did go into hiding, would he really be that dangerous? He's lost his powers if he loses Libya, and is just another grain of sand in the desert - completely harmless. That's assuming Libya resolves any problems and isn't divided.

[Casanova]

I think you've asked the wrong question.The rebels have had so many loses. They'd do nothing but kill Gaddafi?

I think if there was a credible ground force you would of course capture him because it would be illegal to do otherwise.

[-:Undertaker:-]

I would put him on trial and should he be found guilty would like to see him hung.

[QuotePort]

Considering that the SAS are there in plain clothes helping search for him, they will most likely capture him. The NATO will have a deal in place of some sort to keep him alive so that he can be punished.

[Casanova]

Considering that the SAS are there in plain clothes helping search for him, they will most likely capture him. The NATO will have a deal in place of some sort to keep him alive so that he can be punished.

I don't think it's ethical to have SAS in there looking for him.

[QuotePort]

I don't think it's ethical to have SAS in there looking for him.

Neither is supplying the rebel forces with weapons, at least if the SAS do find him we'll have some say in how the situation goes down.

[Casanova]

Neither is supplying the rebel forces with weapons, at least if the SAS do find him we'll have some say in how the situation goes down.

No we won't. The people should choose, not us!?

[QuotePort]

No we won't. The people should choose, not us!?

Yeah, I'm sure some armed rebel pumped with adrenaline who has just broken into the former dictators hideout won't make an influenced split-second decision. At least the SAS will have a cool head.

But don't get me wrong, I do believe that they should decide. I just don't think that they are in a position to do so.

[Casanova]

Yeah, I'm sure some armed rebel pumped with adrenaline who has just broken into the former dictators hideout won't make an influenced split-second decision. At least the SAS will have a cool head.

Are you CRAZY? it's not our fight to get involved in. Do you know how much iraq and afghanistan has cost us? We're broke mate!
Also their dictator doesn't pose a thread to us, unlike saddam "did" LMAO.