sep 11th

[Nisus]

Firstly, I will be examining the coverage of the attacks by two American newspapers. The two examples I will be discussing are The Examiner and The Wall Street Journal, both published on the day following the attacks.
Both news papers are writing about the terror able incident on September 11th 2001 on the Twin towers. The Examiner, in The Examiner there is hardly no writing and there is a massive picture of the twin Towers with the plains that crashed in to them, The wall street journal has millions of blocks that are full of writing in them, also there is no pictures what so ever on the incident of the twin towers but there is the tinniest picture of New York on a map.
The two papers are so totally different to each other because one paper has loads of writing and the other one has a big massive picture on it. One of the papers has loads of information on it and the other one has no longer got any word and it has a big massive title saying *******S.
Speech is the most common means of human communication, and although it is most frequency employed on an intermit level between a small number of parties, it as also long been customary for one person to address large numbers to get there view across.:eusa_danc

[$@m]

So you're going to be doing a review on the effect the 2 papers idividually had on the public?