man u 2 chelsea 0

[danny-dyer]

2nd goal was a bit of a fluke i rekon it was a dive

[Aflux]

It was, they said it was but even still - lol at Chelsea for sacking bigM.

[Jordie]

sending off was harsh i thourght
and it didnt help when they conceded a goal in the last minute of stoppage time there was never anyway back from there for chelsea
saha did make the most out of ben haims foul on him in the box but there was contact therefore saha can go to ground.

[Titch]

I support man u but gotta agree saha didnt half dive.

Sending off was very harsh but if it wernt then it was going to be soon cus he wasnt playing to good level.

[iMegz.]

I'm a Man United fan and I'd say the sending off was harsh..

but over all Man United deserved too win, Chelsea just went missing.. Shouldn't have sacked Mourinho, he will be a big loss.

[Jamie!]

If anything, it should have been Joe Cole that was sent off for his lunge at Ronaldo. Thought Mikel was unlucky with his sending off.

And the penalty was a **** decision and all, definate dive. Saying that though, Van Der Saar had nothing to do, the most he worked was controlling a backpass from a Man Utd defender.

[piddle2k6]

Yer JC's challenge was disgusting and i think the ref knew he shouldnt have sent off mikel so only gave JC a yellow

[Browney]

I'm a manchester supporter and it was a dive. On MOTD2 they showed two tackles exactly the same and Rooney carried on but Saha went down like a sack of spuds.

[velocity]

being a chelsea fan, i dont think chelsea did too bad, considering the position they were in. some harsh decisions here & there but at the end of the day, man u won!