Vouching / Un-Vouching

[Wyked]

If people are allowed to vouch and make a user look trusted, why can we not "Un-vouch"

I'm sure people could make up their own minds as to whether they trust them or not? ^.^

Don't come up with "Well we have the official unsafe list"

'cos that's a load of bull

[Saosin]

causes too many arguements. you got the untrusted list, be happy.

[Wyked]

causes too many arguements. you got the untrusted list, be happy.

Surely vouching causes as many, if not more arguments?

[Wizzdom]

If we did allow this rule, alot of members would abuse it and therefore the person buying/selling would have no hope atall of selling/buying something.

Hope this helps.

[J4M3S]

because habbox is god n habbox says no!


Edited by Tweety (Forum Moderator): Please do not pointlessly post.

[Wyked]

If we did allow this rule, alot of members would abuse it and therefore the person buying/selling would have nop hope atall of selling/buying something.

Hope this helps.

No, if you have 2 totally trusted members vouching for them, and 3 idiots mouthing off, I think the majority of users would come to a pretty good conclusion?

Surely we should get rid of vouching as well? that causes far more arguments

because habbox is god n habbox says no!

I like the cut of your jib

[Wizzdom]

No, if you have 2 totally trusted members vouching for them, and 3 idiots mouthing off, I think the majority of users would come to a pretty good conclusion?

Surely we should get rid of vouching as well? that causes far mroe arguments




I like the cut of your jib

Even if this is true, there would be never ending arguements, therefore breaking rules. I think we should just stick with what he have. As you mentioned, there is always the untrusted list to back up players and help them.

[Saosin]

if you see someone going first for a scammer just simply PM them.

[Wyked]

Even if this is true, there would be never ending arguements, therefore breaking rules. I think we should just stick with what he have. As you mentioned, there is always the untrusted list to back up players and help them.

So we don't use one rule for fear of causing arguments

and keep another that clearly DOES cause arguments?

Where's the logic in that?

if you see someone going first for a scammer just simply PM them.

We'd have to patrol the forum all day for such to be effective.

[J4M3S]

i wud luv to just post in every single thread saying SCAMMERRR !!
cos we all know everyone on *Removed*


Edited by Tweety (Forum Moderator): Please do not accuse anyone of scamming or any other bad things.