REPUTATION = Perfect solution.

[Cixso]

Ok.

This will end your excuse with you can't hire reputation editors because they need admincp access blablabla.

You can set usergroup permissions on who can edit the user's reputation. MEANING no admincp is needed.

Screenshots.

When a user click his/hers admin cp. (THIS CAN BE CONTROLLED BY USER PERMISSIONS. SO YOU COULD DO THIS FOR VIP MEMBERS.)



When a user clicks the archive button as shown above.



When somebody has permission, click on the "edit" besides the rep as shown above.



This is how you set the user group permissions.





I CAN'T REPLY AS I AM A CAUTIONED MEMBER.

Thought's? No edit of templates, works on V3.6 AND V3.7. Just a xml important and a few file uploads.

[jesus]

But there is no problem - we have a reputation editor.

[Elkaa]

I don't recall us ever having a problem with hireing Reputation Editors? Nick- does it.

[mat64]

There's nothing wrong with just having Nick- or any other administrator do the editing though in my opinion.

[Charlie]

Besides it takes about 5 years for them to get around to it.

[Pat McGroin]

I don't recall us ever having a problem with hireing Reputation Editors? Nick- does it.

It's the usual excuse for not hiring rep editors. It's like "They'd need admincp access and we have no trust at all in our staff so we can't do it" more or less.

[today]

There is a problem using this. Its not by default for us

[Catzsy]

Anybody think though whilst yes there are rep editors that Sarith has in fact come up with an ingenius idea that could be employed in some capacity? It would be great if staff and members weren't so dismissive when somebody is trying to be positive and helpful. Probably would not replace editors but
maybe useful in some other way?

[jesus]

Anybody think though whilst yes there are rep editors that Sarith has in fact come up with an ingenius idea that could be employed in some capacity? It would be great if staff and members weren't so dismissive when somebody is trying to be positive and helpful. Probably would not replace editors but
maybe useful in some other way?

If Habbox implemented this it wouldn't be that bad, but Nick- would be even more bored than he already is when he comes on here and out of a job.

[warezkid3]

It also a safety risk, becasue it a hack.